The Atheist Experience 28.06 with JMike and Jim Barrows

In today’s episode of The Atheist Experience, Jim Barrows and Armin Navabi challenge religious claims and societal norms. They confront CS Lewis's flawed logic, dissect the reliability of religious texts, and explore the deep-seated reasons why beliefs persist, even when unsupported by evidence.<br /><br />Becky in CO asks if gospels are firsthand accounts, prompted by her granddaughter's reaction to religious imagery. Jim and Armin explain historical methods, citing differing writing styles, manuscript comparisons, and late authorship attribution. They discuss how memories fade and stories evolve, much like a "game of telephone." Why do religious narratives receive such uncritical acceptance?<br /><br />David in WA, a gay man, calls to discuss Jim’s past comment regarding homosexuality not being "natural." He highlights its prevalence across animal species, but more importantly, the political weaponization of the "unnatural" argument to deny LGBTQ+ rights. Jim clarifies his views have evolved, affirming support. Armin asks if "naturalness" should even matter if no harm is done. The conversation emphasizes the terrifying political climate.<br /><br />Chris in NC describes being socially ostracized in his hyper-religious town after his ex-spouse outed him as an atheist during their divorce. His neighbors, for whom he'd performed medical services, now avoid him. Jim suggests secular support groups, while Armin recommends a "charm offensive" to normalize atheism and change perceptions in the community. How can individuals navigate such intense, localized religious intolerance?<br /><br />Guo in CO defines God as the "laws of nature," such as physics and entropy, arguing they are real and we are forced to live by them. Jim and Armin clarify that while these laws exist, using "God" for them causes communication issues, as the common definition of God implies a conscious, willful creator. They liken it to calling a cat "God." Does redefining common terms clarify or obscure understanding?<br /><br />Dawn in CA seeks recommendations for anti-theism studies, logical fallacies, and constitutional law, questioning the reliability of gospels and societal "retrogression." Jim suggests Andrew Seidel's books on church/state separation and studying religions to combat them. Armin emphasizes learning logical fallacies and recommends his book "Why There's No God." The discussion also touches on Bart Ehrman for biblical contradictions and the general regression of society.<br /><br />Carson in OK struggles with religious terminology in sobriety groups, feeling alienated by the constant talk of a "higher power." He seeks secular alternatives for community and support, finding Buddhist meetings more palatable than AA. Jim suggests seculartherapy.org, recoveringfromreligion.org, and online communities. Armin proposes starting a secular group. Can one reinterpret "higher power" or is a fully secular approach necessary for atheists in recovery?.<br /><br />Marco in Holland asks why belief persists if God was conceived from a lack of scientific knowledge. Armin explains religion often serves as a "membership card" and identity, making deconversion scary due to loss of community. Jim adds that many see science as explaining how God created things. Marco also notes religion’s universal "solution for death" as a powerful meme for survival. <br /><br />Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!<br /><br /><br />Become a supporter of this podcast: <a href="https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-atheist-experience--3254896/support?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss">https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-atheist-experience--3254896/support</a>.