Banning Open Source AI Would Be A Mistake

<p><em>This post was originally an op-ed co-authored with </em><a href="https://substack.com/profile/9714824-kevin-xu" target="_blank"><em>Kevin Xu</em></a> <em>of </em><a href="https://interconnect.substack.com/" target="_blank"><em>Interconnected</em></a> <em>for a general, non-technical audience. The gatekeepers — the many media outlets we pitched it to — passed on publishing it. Luckily, we have our own platforms to get the message out. Please help us forward this op-ed to any one you know who is on the fence about open source AI or new to the topic and want to learn more. Thank you.</em></p><p>The energy to regulate AI is in the air in Washington. With the recently signed executive order to review AI models, <a href="https://www.politico.com/2026/06/04/obernolte-trahan-ai-draft" target="_blank">a congressional proposal</a> to legislate AI further, the government <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/05/trump-open-ai-altman-stake.html" target="_blank">possibly taking shares</a> of frontier AI labs, and last Friday’s <a href="https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/amazon-ceos-talks-with-u-s-officials-triggered-crackdown-on-anthropic-models-dcc90578?mod=Searchresults&#38;pos=1&#38;page=1" target="_blank">action</a> prohibiting foreign nationals anywhere from accessing Anthropic’s most advanced models, this may be the opening salvo of more AI regulation to come.</p><p>We are afraid future actions could inadvertently or intentionally regulate or even ban open source, a much maligned and misunderstood topic in AI. That would be a grave mistake.</p><p>Open source – simply a process that allows technology to be shared, built, and distributed publicly and transparently – is safe, secure, and drives economic growth. More than <a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/research/octoverse-2022-10-years-of-tracking-open-source/" target="_blank">90% of the world’s software</a> was already built on open source and produced more than <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4693148" target="_blank">8 trillion dollars</a> worth of economic benefits, long before AI entered the picture. Today, open source technology is quietly training, improving, deploying, and securing AI everywhere.</p><p>For more than three decades, open source has been powering three trends, and upholding three values, which the American society holds dear – education, competition, and innovation.</p><p><strong>Open source is pro-education</strong> because its origin was rooted in academic institutions trying to make technology free and open, not held hostage to the profit-maximizing zeal or the menacing lawyers of large corporations.</p><p>The precursor of open source is the free software movement, which started in 1983 on the campus of MIT. It was a time when every small act of using software, whether it was teaching students or doing research or improving a printer’s performance, meant paying or dealing with big corporations like AT&amp;T or Xerox. After this struggle gave birth to open source, every student in every university, community college, and coding bootcamp in America now taps into the freedom that open source enables to learn how to program, engineer, and build. Open source is at the heart of technical education everywhere.</p><p><strong>Open source is pro-innovation</strong> because it essentially provides a set of tools plus a community of other users to help anyone turn an idea into reality, for free. Combined with its role in education, it has watered most of the seeds of innovation in recent memory. Some of these seeds stayed as hobbies that brought joy and personal learning to the hobbyists. Others blossomed into huge companies, like Meta, where the initial version of Facebook was built entirely on a stack of open source software.</p><p>Every day, new ideas or solutions are being coded up in a dorm room, garage, or basement, all because open source lets innovators create without fear of a lawsuit or an expensive bill.</p><p><strong>Open source is pro-competition</strong> because it helps the underdogs challenge and compete with the large incumbents, keeping monopolistic threats at bay. Linux, the open source operating system that now runs more than 90% of the world’s cloud computing infrastructure, was the antidote to the Windows monopoly (so much so that former Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer, called Linux “cancer”). Android, the open source mobile system, fostered a long string of competitive smartphones before Apple’s iPhone could control the market. Many other examples exist in the more niche, but no less important, segments of self-driving, databases, and semiconductor design.</p><p>Without the equalizing and democratizing nature of open source, we would all be living with the rent-seeking consequences of more monopolies and less free market competition.</p><p>Does AI change any of this? No.</p><p>The duopoly of Anthropic and OpenAI are rapidly concentrating power between them with their closed, proprietary models. Anthropic, in particular, has flexed its monopolistic muscle recently by <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/anthropic-responds-to-backlash-on-claudes-secret-sabotage-on-ai-research/" target="_blank">reducing its most advanced model’s capability</a> when it is being used to improve someone else’s model. While the capabilities of their models are undeniable, so are their price tags and market concentration. Open source AI, mostly in the form of open weight models, has been the only counterweight for startups, educational institutions, and enterprises looking for alternatives.</p><p>Does open source lead to more safety or security concerns? Not quite.</p><p>We acknowledge it is worth monitoring the security implications of open source models that may reach frontier capabilities. But for the most part, the transparency that is inherent to open source makes them safer and more secure, because more engineers and researchers can tune out unwanted model behaviors, like censorship, or fix bugs in the software that runs these models. As one popular <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus%27s_law" target="_blank">saying goes</a>, “given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.” An open source model also does not transfer data, when installed on your own company’s infrastructure as Airbnb CEO, Brian Chesky, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-20/airbnb-s-chesky-says-us-misunderstanding-use-of-chinese-open-source-ai-models" target="_blank">explained</a>. Open source AI is the most secure and privacy friendly path.</p><p>What about China? Beware of unintended consequences.</p><p>China is certainly a fierce competitor with the US on many dimensions – economically, militarily, diplomatically – but using this dynamic as a pretext to regulate open source will backfire.</p><p>Open source models are actually improving the efficiency and profitability of many American startups, who cannot afford to pay the monopoly-level premium to Anthropic or OpenAI. AI companies working in <a href="https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-technical-report" target="_blank">coding</a>, <a href="https://fireworks.ai/blog/open-source-agents-frontier-advisors" target="_blank">legal</a>, and other domains are using open source models, including ones from China, every day. The fact that these models are made by Chinese labs should be a wake-up call that open source is under-invested and under-appreciated in America! The response should be more support for open source at home. Regulating or limiting open source because of China would achieve the opposite: putting a chilling effect on education, innovation, and competition, while pushing the rest of the world – much of which wants open source’s benefits as much as we do – to adopt China’s.</p><p>Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, famously said, “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants,” when it comes to removing corporate or societal misconduct. Open source is that “sunlight” in technology and AI. America should always be on the side of light.</p> <br /><br />This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit <a href="https://www.interconnects.ai/subscribe?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_2">www.interconnects.ai/subscribe</a>