San Francisco Democrats PASS Black Privilege Law

<p>In this video, I discuss how the Chicago board of supervisors recently nearly unanimously passed a reparations fund bill despite all logic &amp; reason indicating they shouldn't</p><p>Website: https://www.actualjusticewarrior.com/</p><p>https://linktr.ee/ActualJustice</p><p>Odysee: https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2</p><p>Rumble: https://rumble.com/ActualJusticeWarrior</p><p>Instagram NEW: https://www.instagram.com/actualjustice/</p><p>Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/actualjusticewarrior</p><p>2nd Channel: https://www.youtube.com/ajw2dreamscometrue</p><p>TeeSpring Store: https://teespring.com/stores/actualjusticewarrior</p><p>New Store: https://actualjusticewarrior.myspreadshop.com/</p><p>https://www.minds.com/actualjusticewarrior</p><p>Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SeanFitzgerald</p><p>Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/Iamsean90</p><p>Venmo: https://venmo.com/iamsean90</p><p>Support me on Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/seanfitzgerald</p><p>Gab: https://gab.com/Iamsean90</p><p>Twitter https://twitter.com/iamsean90&nbsp;</p><p>Backup Twitter https://twitter.com/AJWSean</p><p>Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/actualjusticewarrior/</p><p>Discord: https://discord.gg/c7PGFFp</p><p>3rd: https://www.youtube.com/user/DudeMonkeyHQ</p><p><br /></p><p>Podcast Links:</p><p>Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1o0q86AVIzH1ZhCl8pe3du?si=e260b6ab98d64e74</p><p><br /></p><p>Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/actual-justice-warrior/id1637748971</p><p><br /></p><p>Sources:</p><p><br /></p><p>Local News Segment: https://youtu.be/NOhjcxJ3YhA?si=9QUVTvvnN-i7Ia8l</p><p><br /></p><p>More On The Proposal: https://www.businessinsider.com/san-francisco-black-reparations-plan-hearing-2023-3</p><p><br /></p><p>My Previous Video On San Fran Reparations: https://youtu.be/HAOrLAOHoXk</p><p><br /></p><p>#SanFrancisco #Reparations #IamSean90</p><p><br /></p><p>FAIR USE NOTICE</p><p>This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.</p>