Limiting the Inevitable Damage

<p>Melissa, Kate, and Leah welcome <a href="https://twitter.com/sambhavsankar">Sam Sankar</a> of <a href="https://earthjustice.org/">Earthjustice</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/RossDeuel">Deuel Ross</a> of <a href="https://www.naacpldf.org/">NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund</a> to recap  arguments the Supreme Court heard this week in two big cases. <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/21-454"><i>Sackett</i> v. <i>EPA</i></a> is a challenge to the EPA’s authority to regulate wetlands, and <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2022/21-1086"><i>Merrill</i> v. <i>Milligan</i></a> is a Voting Rights Act case out of Alabama that’s really about whether Congress may ensure the representation and political power of voters of color.</p><p></p><p>Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025! </p><ul>

<li>3/6/26 – San Francisco</li>

<li>3/7/26 – Los Angeles</li>

</ul><p></p><p>Learn more: <a href="http://crooked.com/events">http://crooked.com/events</a></p><p>Order your copy of Leah's book, <a href="https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Lawless/Leah-Litman/9781668054628">Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes</a></p><p>Follow us on <a href="https://www.instagram.com/strictscrutinypodcast/?hl=en">Instagram</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.net/@strictscrutinypodcast">Threads</a>, and <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/strictscrutiny.bsky.social">Bluesky</a></p>