Trump's New Scapegoat Gets Grilled

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit <a href="https://michaelfanone.substack.com?utm_medium=podcast&#38;utm_campaign=CTA_7">michaelfanone.substack.com</a><br /><br /><p>Kristi Noem walked into a hearing this week thinking she was going to do the usual Washington two-step: “we take this seriously,” “it’s under review,” “I’ll get back to you.”</p><p>Instead, she got lit up.</p><p>And it wasn’t because senators suddenly found a spine. It’s because DHS is sitting on top of a pile of chaos tied to Trump’s immigration crackdown—and somebody had to show up and take the hits. That somebody is Noem.</p><p>Here’s what this hearing really was: a preview of how Trump handles scandals. He doesn’t absorb them—he <strong>assigns</strong> them.</p><p>The questions kept circling back to Minnesota, because you can’t hide from dead Americans.</p><p>Two U.S. citizens were killed during protests connected to federal immigration operations. That’s a sentence that should stop the country cold, and the fact we’re already “moving on” is part of the problem.</p><p>Noem’s posture was predictable: “it’s under investigation,” “we’re looking into it,” “we’ll review mistaken arrests of citizens.” But that last part is the quiet admission everyone should be paying attention to: <strong>U.S. citizens being swept up in enforcement operations is not a PR issue. It’s an operational failure.</strong> It means somebody is running a machine that’s moving too fast to verify who they’re grabbing—or they don’t care.</p><p>Either way, it’s not “law and order.” It’s chaos with badges.</p><p>If Minnesota was the moral gut-punch, the spending questions were the credibility punch.</p><p>Lawmakers pressed DHS over a deportation plane purchase being described as “luxury” while the department is tangled in shutdown politics and funding brinkmanship. Even if you strip away the rhetoric, the optics are brutal: DHS wants more authority, more money, fewer restrictions—while acting like basic accountability is optional.</p><p>But the real bomb wasn’t the plane.</p><p>It was the <strong>$143 million contract</strong>.</p><p>A contract that, on its face, looks like the kind of thing that triggers every fraud alarm in government: a company incorporated days before getting the award, no clear footprint, no obvious headquarters, and the address trail leading into political-world territory. When asked the simplest question—<em>where is this company headquartered?</em>—Noem didn’t have an answer.</p><p>“I don’t know” is not a response you get to give when you’re signing off on $143 million of taxpayer money. That’s not “oops.” That’s negligence at best and something darker at worst.</p><p><strong>And then the credibility trap snapped shut</strong></p><p>One of the most revealing moments wasn’t even about policy—it was about <strong>what she said</strong> and what she’s now pretending she didn’t say.</p><p>Noem tried to walk back past comments about one of the Minnesota victims, framing it like people misunderstood her. The problem is: the receipts exist. When you’re in front of Congress, you don’t get to rewrite your own words just because they became inconvenient.</p><p>That’s how officials talk when they’re trying to manage a story, not tell the truth.</p><p>Here’s the larger dynamic nobody in Washington will say out loud: Kristi Noem didn’t invent Trump’s immigration agenda. She’s just the one being sent out to defend it.</p><p>The surge tactics, the aggressive operations, the rhetoric, the posture toward oversight—this comes from the White House. And Trump’s oldest move is letting underlings take the fall while he keeps his hands clean.</p><p>So the question isn’t “did Noem have a bad hearing?”</p><p>The question is: <strong>how long before Trump decides she’s more useful as a sacrifice than as a shield?</strong></p><p>Because that’s what scapegoats are for. They take the heat so the boss doesn’t have to.</p><p>And based on how this hearing went, the heat isn’t cooling down. It’s building.</p><p>If you want this show to keep tracking the paper trail—hearings, contracts, internal investigations, and the real-world consequences of DHS policy—become a <strong>paid subscriber</strong>. That’s how we keep doing this without a corporate leash. And if you know something about the Minnesota operations or that contracting mess, reply to this post—my team will follow up.</p><p>Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.</p><p>🟧 <strong>Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order</strong>🟧 <strong>Founding Members get 20% off for life</strong></p><p>You’ll get the link in your welcome email.</p><p><strong>GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!</strong></p>