GM06: The hidden danger of Passive Investing ft. Michael Green
August 4, 2020
1 hr 1 min
Full
361 of 941

August 4, 2020
GM06: The hidden danger of Passive Investing ft. Michael Green
0:00 / 1:01:21
Excerpt playback isn’t available for this episode — use the full-episode link.
Search the Record
Moment search isn’t open for this episode yet
When it opens, you’ll be able to type any phrase and jump straight to the second it was said.
The Sharpe Exchange Episodes Around August 4, 2020
Episode 361 of 941 — walk the feed in the order it was published.
1:01:21This episodeGM06: The hidden danger of Passive Investing ft. Michael Green
Summary
In today’s episode, we are joined by Michael Green, of Logica Capital advisors. Michael has over 20 years as a portfolio manager, mainly in the global macro space. Recently he has become well known because of his work on the shift to passive investing, and inevitably this was one of the topics we wanted to ask Mike about. Our conversation wasn’t limited to that however, and we also discussed comparisons between the present day and previous historical crisis (going back to the Roman Empire!), as well as many other interesting subjects.
Topics Discussed in this Episode
Passive investing
ETFs and target date funds
Intergenerational inequality
“(The) growth of passive is now basically built into the system. From a regulatory framework, all the new money that comes into the U.S Savings and Investment accounts (primarily in the form of 401Ks and IRAs), are coming in passive vehicles.”
Real interest rates over history
Mean reversion and momentum
Negative interest rates
“I think negative interest rates are absurd and that they're a view that I articulated back in 2015 and is now, I think, increasingly accepted that they're ultimately harmful to the banking system. They create a tax on the banking system.”
Leverage: recourse vs no recourse (limited liability)
“I think another component that people generally under-appreciate is that while we all complain about leverage and we complain about the high levels of debt, the flavor-de-jour of how we solve this is something like risk parity which says, "OK, let's lever our portfolio 10X in the fixed income space, and let's add..."
MMT
“MMT is right but it offers almost no prescriptions for how that money should be spent. So, by handing it over to the politicians, we're at least in a situation where you could see outcomes of how that money gets spent that we have never predicted.”
Yield enhancement strategies
Links
Catch up with Michael and learn more about his work:
Logica
Follow Niels, Moritz, Rob on Twitter:
Niels Kaastrup-Larsen
Moritz Seibert
Rob Carver
Subscribe on:
Full Transcript
The following is a full detailed transcript of this conversion. Subscribe to the podcast to get access to all of our transcripts as eBook downloads!
Michael
If I’m running a discretionary program and that’s going into some form of a structured product (and this doesn’t happen for precisely this reason), if I choose to do something that is different than I would have done historically, then the results of that product could be very different than I have advertised them for and I’d become liable. So, I’m forced into a quantitative system. That's actually part of the reason why I partnered with Wayne is that I realized that until the rules change there is, actually, no substitute to a documented quantitative process.





























