Ep. 3384 Is THIS Supreme Court Justice about To Be REMOVED?

<p><span>Break down the shockwaves from a 6-3 Supreme Court ruling backing sweeping presidential removal power over the Department of Education and what that means for executive authority under Article II. I connect the dots from </span><em>Myers</em><span> to </span><em>Humphrey’s Executor</em><span>, show why the current Court’s direction could upend decades of bureaucratic insulation, and examine the viral debate over Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent, the so‑called “auto pen” controversy, and whether impeachment is the only real path to removing a justice. Get the context, the constitutional stakes, the federal workforce numbers being cited, and why this fight is bigger than one agency—it's about who actually runs the administrative state. Smack that bell and subscribe for analysis you won’t hear anywhere else.</span></p><p><span>–</span></p><p><span>Get 25% off – Use Code: </span><strong>TURLEY</strong><span> at </span><a href="https://mybrightcore.com/turley" rel="nofollow">https://mybrightcore.com/turley</a><span> Or call (888) 597-0233 for up to 50% OFF your order and Free Shipping!"</span></p><p><em>*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*</em></p><p><br /></p><p><span>My newest book, "America Awakened," is now restocked on Amazon after it SOLD OUT! If you haven’t grabbed your copy yet, NOW is the time to order before it flies off the shelves again! </span><a href="https://turley.pub/AmericaAwakened" rel="nofollow">https://turley.pub/AmericaAwakened</a></p><p><br /></p><p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p><ul><li><span>“Significance of the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling backing Trump’s firings at the Department of Education and its Article II implications.”</span></li><li><span>“How </span><em>Myers</em><span> (1926) and </span><em>Humphrey’s Executor</em><span> (1935) shaped — and may no longer constrain — presidential removal power.”</span></li><li><span>“Federal workforce downsizing numbers being cited as the “Deep State purge” accelerates across multiple agencies.” </span></li><li><span>“Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s lone dissent, “auto pen” questions around Biden-era actions, and why impeachment is the only realistic removal mechanism.”</span></li></ul><p><br /></p><p><strong>Timestamps:   </strong></p><p><span>[00:20] The Supreme Court just handed conservatives their biggest victory in decades – and the left is melting down.</span></p><p><span>[01:27] Six conservative justices granted the Trump administration’s request to temporarily pause an order by a federal judge in Massachusetts that would require the Department of Education to reinstate nearly 1,400 employees who were fired earlier this year as part of the Trump administration’s gutting of this liberal monstrosity!.</span></p><p><span>[04:41] Since January, Trump's federal workforce overhaul has resulted in approximately 59,000 job losses across the federal government. </span></p><p><span>[07:25] The Supreme Court just days ago issued an 8-1 decision, 8 to 1, that overturned a lower court injunction that had blocked the federal government from moving forward with a Trump executive order that directed 19 federal departments to develop plans for large-scale layoffs.</span></p><p><span>[09:12] Biden administration's use of auto pen devices for critical presidential actions.</span></p><p><span>–</span></p><p><span>Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.</span></p><p><span>FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): </span><a href="https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks</a></p><p><span>Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: </span><a href="https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter" rel="nofollow">https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter</a></p><p><em>**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.</em></p><br /><br />Advertising Inquiries: <a href="https://redcircle.com/brands">https://redcircle.com/brands</a><br /><br />Privacy & Opt-Out: <a href="https://redcircle.com/privacy">https://redcircle.com/privacy</a>