Ep. 3556 You Won’t BELIEVE What The Supreme Court Just DID!!!

<p><span>The recent Supreme Court ruling allowing the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 300,000 Venezuelan nationals marks a significant victory for the Trump administration, reinforcing executive authority as intended by the Constitution. This decision not only highlights the court's support for Trump's policies but also reflects a broader effort to restore the separation of powers, challenging the influence of the administrative state. Justice Ketanji Jackson's dissent underscores a growing divide within the judiciary, as her responses appear to cater more to radical leftist activism than to legal principles.</span></p><p><strong>         </strong></p><p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p><ul><li><span>"Supreme Court affirms Trump's ability to terminate TPS for Venezuelans."</span></li><li><span>"Justice Ketanji Jackson's dissent viewed as an unhinged response to court decisions."</span></li><li><span>"Restoration of executive power under Article 2 of the Constitution emphasized."</span></li><li><span>"Judicial rulings challenge the administrative state's influence on policy-making."</span></li></ul><p><span>–</span></p><p><span>Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.</span></p><p><span>FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): </span><a href="https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks</a></p><p><span>Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: </span><a href="https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter" rel="nofollow">https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter</a></p><p><em>**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.</em></p><br /><br />Advertising Inquiries: <a href="https://redcircle.com/brands">https://redcircle.com/brands</a><br /><br />Privacy & Opt-Out: <a href="https://redcircle.com/privacy">https://redcircle.com/privacy</a>