Ep. 3603 Trump CRUSHES Blue States as Supreme Court DESTROYS Antifa!!!

<p><span>President Trump's winning streak continues as he and the Supreme Court prepare to dismantle the resistance from blue state governors and their cities. The discussion highlights the implications of the historic Supreme Court case Martin v. Mott, which affirms the president's absolute authority over the National Guard in enforcing federal laws. This ruling not only challenges the defiance of sanctuary cities but also signals a potential shift in the balance of power towards MAGA policies, reinforcing Trump's constitutional dominance in American politics.</span></p><p><span>–</span></p><p><span>Revive Collagen from Brightcore – Heal Yourself from the Inside Out!</span></p><p><span>Get 25% off – Use Code: TURLEY at  https://mybrightcore.com/turley</span></p><p><span>Or call (888) 597-0233 for up to 50% OFF your order and Free Shipping!/</span></p><p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p><p><span>• "“Supreme Court case Martin v. Mott affirms presidential authority over National Guard.”"</span></p><p><span>• "“Blue state governors face legal challenges as they resist federal immigration enforcement.”"</span></p><p><span>• "“Trump's potential 30th Supreme Court victory solidifies MAGA dominance in politics.”"</span></p><p><span>• "“Historical context reveals a shift towards constitutional rule against unelected bureaucrats.”"</span></p><p><span>–</span></p><p><span>Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.</span></p><p><span>FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): </span><a href="https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks</a></p><p><span>Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: </span><a href="https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter" rel="nofollow">https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter</a></p><p><em>**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.</em></p><br /><br />Advertising Inquiries: <a href="https://redcircle.com/brands">https://redcircle.com/brands</a><br /><br />Privacy & Opt-Out: <a href="https://redcircle.com/privacy">https://redcircle.com/privacy</a>