Aj
@ajplus·2.5M subscribers·7K videos
Why UBI Isn't Progressive
Posted
September 27, 2019
Views
29,103
Likes
1,611
Comments
1,377
Engagement
10.27%
September 27, 2019
29,103
1,611
1,377
10.27%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
11:12Now PlayingWho doesn't want free money? Sure, a universal basic income ($1,000 a month with "no strings attached") sounds like a good idea. But under presidential candidate Andrew Yang's plan, a UBI would replace government benefits and would be paid for by the working class, not the rich. Newsbroke's Matt Lieb explains how the "Freedom Dividend" is simply a way to maintain the current economic status quo.
(The opinions expressed on Newsbroke are those of the creators and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of AJ+.)
When robots eat your job, will a basic income save you?
Universal Basic Income: A Utopian Idea Whose Time May Finally Have Arrived
A Brief History of Free Money
Will ‘basic income’ become the California norm? Stockton starts $500 no-strings payments
A Universal Basic Income Is a Poor Tool to Fight Poverty
The Paradox of Universal Basic Income
What Andrew Yang’s Universal Basic Income Would Actually Look Like
#UBI #Yang2020 #FreedomDividend
Subscribe for more videos
Follow us on Instagram
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
