Would God Allow Kids To Get Cancer? Maybe...
August 2, 2019
354,971
19,234
7,021
7.40%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Alex O'Connor Episodes Around August 2, 2019
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:18:55DEBATE: Is Christianity True? | Cosmic Skeptic vs Jonathan McLatchie
22:10Now PlayingWould God Allow Kids To Get Cancer? Maybe...
Segments
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelTo support me on Patreon (thank you)
To donate to my PayPal (thank you)
To purchase Cosmic Skeptic merchandise
To anybody who supports (or even considers supporting) my channel monetarily, thank you. I am naturally grateful for any engagement with my work, but it is specifically people like you that allow me to do what I do, and to do so whilst avoiding sponsorship.
--------------------------------------VIDEO NOTES--------------------------------------
The problem of evil is one of the most famous and powerful arguments against God's existence, but it less famously comes in multiple forms.
In this video, Jon McCray, from the YouTube channel, 'Whaddo You Meme??' argues that it may be justifiable for a loving God to permit children getting cancer, in order to serve some greater good. I'm less than convinced.
Some philosophical notes:
1. There is a difference between an argument being deductive and being valid. All examples of deductive arguments I have given are valid (for simplicity of explanation). First characterisation of the logical problem of evil ('I can't think of a reason, therefore there is no reason') is invalid, yet it is clear from the conclusion that he is attempting a deductive rather than an inductive argument. It is therefore an invalid deductive argument. The very point Jon is making is that the conclusion doesn't follow from the premise, implying that it should do in order to be a good argument. If the conclusion must follow to make it a good argument, it is an attempt at deduction.
2. My use of the word 'syllogism' throughout this video is regrettable upon review. A syllogism is technically a formation of a valid deductive argument, not just any formation of any argument (which is how I was using it). If confused, replace my use of 'syllogism' with 'specific version of an argument'.
--------------------------------------------LINKS---------------------------------------------
Original video
All upcoming events
Inductive/deductive arguments
J.L. Mackie, Evil and Omnipotence
-----------------------------------------CONNECT------------------------------------------
My Website/Blog
SOCIAL LINKS:
Snapchat: cosmicskeptic
The Cosmic Skeptic Podcast
----------------------------------------CONTACT-------------------------------------------
Business email: cosmicskeptic@gmail.com
Or send me something:
Alex O'Connor
Po Box 1610
OXFORD
OX4 9LL
ENGLAND
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.