October 13, 2020
2,852
32
1.12%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
1:28Now PlayingSupreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett tried to distinguish the difference in the more abstract way that legal scholars think and write about cases compared to the responsibility of judges. "I have had the experience of changing my mind at various points along the way. I have gone into oral argument more than once thinking, you know, I was going to rule one way and then oral argument changed my mind," she told Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho. As President Donald Trump's nominee, Barrett's record of legal critiques as a scholar has been scrutinized on issues like abortion and the fate of the Affordable Care Act. She answered questions on the second day of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing. The Oct. 13 hearing comes three weeks before Election Day. The second of four days of scheduled testimony gave senators an opportunity to ask Barrett about her record and approach to the law.
Watch highlights from from Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing Day 1
Watch highlights from Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing Day 2
Stream your PBS favorites with the PBS app
Find more from PBS NewsHour at
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Subscribe:
PBS NewsHour podcasts
Newsletters
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.