July 10, 2022
130,021
9,810
1,142
8.42%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
12:46Now PlayingIn this series, we'll explore the topic of honesty in the legal profession. We'll learn about ethical rules - technical and aspirational - for attorneys, and how they were followed (or not) in the Depp v. Heard trial. What was right, what was wrong, and what was downright Slimeball City? In general, do lawyers have to tell the truth?
The walls are closing in! Details of litigation between two insurance companies who provided policies to Amber Heard for defamation have been revealed. Details of this litigation reveals that Amber Heard did NOT find herself unable to donate to CHLA and ACLU as she promised because she has had to pay $6 million in legal fees - Travelers Insurance Company has paid the bill for her! And Elaine Bredehoft KNEW this, because she is the attorney Travelers approved for her defense! This could be a BIG ethical problem for Elaine.
____
Previous series episodes:
Part 1Introduction
Part 2Aspirations
Part 3Did Amber Heard File a Frivolous Counterclaim?
Part 4Amber Heard Subpoenas Twitter Critics
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.