Can Elaine Be Blamed? - Attorney Analysis - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the Parting Pledge
August 28, 2022
71,026
5,814
629
9.07%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Andrea Burkhart Episodes Around August 28, 2022
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
22:10Dispelling the "Unfairness" Clouds - Attorney Analysis - Unsealed Part 2
20:36Now PlayingCan Elaine Be Blamed? - Attorney Analysis - Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the Parting Pledge
Chapters
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelWas Elaine fired, or did she withdraw voluntarily, or was her removal mandatory? Elaine's exit wasn't exactly "noisy" but it wasn't silent, either. Amber might try to blame Elaine for her trial loss, but the appellate court won't entertain that. There was no requirement to announce it, so what does it mean that they made her termination so public? We'll look at rules setting forth ethical requirements for both mandatory (must) and permissive (may) reasons for a lawyer to terminate representation of a client. What are those requirements, and do we know which one applies here? Finally, we have to give Elaine credit for that very quiet word choice that spoke very loudly in the context of her exit.
New Lawyers, Same Problems
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.