Andrea Burkhart
@aburkhartlaw·133K subscribers·305 videos
Friends of Amber Heard - #2 Amicus Curiae brief adds nothing - Depp v. Heard Attorney analysis
Posted
December 11, 2022
Views
44,230
Likes
3,869
Comments
446
Engagement
December 11, 2022
44,230
3,869
446
9.76%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
22:31Now PlayingThe second amicus curiae brief is basically the same tired attempt at relitigation as the first amicus curiae brief, only more rambling and whiny. It barely even addresses the law and when it does, it fantasizes legal rules that do not exist in the cases from which they are drawn. As with the first amicus brief, these authors have very much confused the private interests of Amber Heard with the legal interests of the public at large. This brief will not move the needle, if it even gets considered. Ben Chew has opposed the amicus briefs, so we'll be looking at his opposition in the next video!
Review of the (trash) first Amicus brief:
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
