January 15, 2023
42,132
3,246
694
9.35%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
20:21Now PlayingIf the defense strategy will be to systematically attack the State's evidence, how will they approach and break down the cell site location information obtained from his phone records? As with all forensic evidence, the devil is in the details; so, we look at some of the questions the defense team is likely to be asking. After an overview of how the communications between cell phones and cell towers can be used to calculate the phone's position, we'll talk about the factors that can affect how reliable and precise these determinations are and why it's potentially a pretty different situation in Moscow, Idaho than in denser urban settings. We also see a hint in the probable cause affidavit that the cell data may not tell the whole story when it comes to determining Bryan Kohberger's location.
For more reading:
Blank, Aaron, The Limitations and Admissibility of Using Historical Cellular Site Data to Track the Location of a Cellular Phone, 18 Rich. J. L. & Tech. 3 (2011)
For more detail on the technical issues:
Hussain, Syed Asad et al., Positioning a Mobile Subscriber in a Cellular Network System Based on Signal Strength, IAENG Int'l J. of Comp. Science, 342 (2007)
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.