July 29, 2019
19,261
2,009
832
14.75%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
13:47Now PlayingIs there a point where protecting free speech goes too far in allowing falsities to thrive, and if so, should the tech giants use their power over content to stifle demonstrable misconceptions and untruths?
People are, of course, entitled to opinions and beliefs, even those that are not supported by reality. You may believe that the Earth is flat or that the best explanation for dinosaur bones is that God created them to test the faith of Bible literalists. The advancement of the internet has made it so easy to access any viewpoint that some people believe tech giants should put their thumb on the scale and prioritize access to factual information on their platforms – at least when it comes to scientific knowledge.
(ARTICLE: RT)
✅ Wooden Flags
*SOCIAL MEDIA*
–––––––––––––––––––––––
👕 Order your shirts here
📲 Tip me though PayPal
📲 Sponsor me on Patreon
🌐 Visit my website
💬 Connect with us on Discord
–––––––––––––––––––––––
Is absolute freedom of speech online a 'mythical unicorn'? (DEBATE)
Absolute freedom of speech a ‘mythical unicorn’? RT panel debates throttling access to false facts
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.