Apostate Prophet vs. Daniel Haqiqatjou: Can Islamic Laws Be Justified?

Daniel Haqiqatjou is a Muslim apologist with traditionalist Islamic views about what we consider personal freedoms. After I addresses his beliefs in my video, we agreed to sit down and have an inquiry about the logic of Islamic law, strict Islamic rules, and personal freedoms.

UPDATE: This video has been unlisted because, despite being relatively cordial and agreeing that we could talk further and have a debate at another time, Daniel Haqiqatjou immediately made all further decency impossible by insulting me, spreading out of context footage about me, and claiming that he had "humiliated me in a debate" and that "this is how you deal with an apostate." Clearly he only wanted to use this stream for publicity, which I will not contribute to unless he returns to negotiate a debate with me.

All views defended and presented by Daniel Haqiqatjou are his and are in no way held by me or this channel.

Researches:

APA Research proving terrible and unhelpful outcomes of physical punishment

Study proving that harsh punishment leads to antisocial behavior and anger

Summary of APA featured studies presenting the ineffectiveness of punishment vs. rehabilitation

Reviewed Healthline article with useful references

Study proving that disgust for homosexuality is related to negative thoughts about homosexuals/homosexuality

Secondary research proving the same

Both of these points are basic parts of a Psychology Introduction curriculum. The two names that Daniel cited are very fringe. It is easy to drop names and make it look like your position carried some credibility. In fact, that is a basic tactic known as Appeal to Authority. Fortunately, science doesn't listen to fallacies but rather to vastly agreed scientific findings.

AP Merchandise

Bitchute(autoupload)