Attorney Melanie Little
@attorneymelanielittle·135K subscribers·815 videos
LIVE💥Day 5 LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL💥Lindsay's Journal Tells All 💥Post Partum Psychosis or Trickery?
Posted
August 3, 2026
Views
112,497
Likes
7,567
Comments
441
August 3, 2026
112,497
7,567
441
7.12%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Episode Timeline
Every episode in order around the one you’re watching — click any card and the page flips straight to it.
7:29:47Now PlayingFor first hand accounts of PPP check out this documentary
MA v Lindsay Clancy
Trial Day 5
Plymouth County, Massachusetts
Judge William Sullivan
Lindsay's thyroid was crushed, cervical spine fractures, massive leakage of CSF from her nose, COMPLETE transection of her spinal cord at T5-6, burst fractures thoracic spine
SUMMARY:
Lindsay Clancy, 35, a labor & delivery nurse, is accused of k*lling her three children (aged 5, 3 & 8 months) on 1/24/23, with exercise bands, after her husband went to pick up takeout, and became a paraplegic after jumping out of a second-story window at her Duxbury home, in a failed attempt to take her own life. Her attorney, Kevin J. Reddington, has argued that she was overmedicated and had undiagnosed postpartum depression, culminating in a psychotic break. Clancy has been under the custody of the Department of Mental Health since at least May 2023, and is being held at Tewksbury Hospital.
Lindsay has pleaded not guilty to three counts of m*rder. Str*ngulation charges were recently dropped by the Commonwealth. Clancy is asserting a “lack of criminal responsibility” defense, commonly known as the insanity defense. In Massachusetts, a defendant is not criminally responsible for a crime if, at the time of the offense, they suffered from a mental disease or defect, and as a result, either lacked the capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct, or lacked the ability to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law. Once the defense is properly raised (through credible expert testimony), the burden shifts to the government to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Defendant was NOT legally insane at the time the acts were committed- even if the Defendant admits to committing the acts.
🛍️ Amazon Storefront
🧁 Join this channel to get access to perks:
Intro song written & produced by Melisa @5150Asylum ❤️
Video montage by @EmilySeee
WAYS TO SUPPORT:
BUY ME A MATCHA
EMAIL: Fanbase@MLittleLaw.com
#lawyerreacts #lawyer #legalanalysis #truecrime #law #lawtube #crime #criminallaw
FOLLOW ME ON SOCIALInstagram
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE: This video is made solely for the purpose of commentary for entertainment and educational purposes, and no attorney -client relationship is created through comments or interaction with this channel. All suspects are deemed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
