"Scientists" Say Babies Need Consent For Diaper Changes
January 23, 2026
8,685
420
369
9.08%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Based Camp with Simone Malcolm Collins Episodes Around January 23, 2026
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:02:21Now Playing"Scientists" Say Babies Need Consent For Diaper Changes
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelIn this episode, we dive into the viral Australian academic advice (from Deakin University researchers) that parents should ask babies for "consent" before changing their diapers. It sounds absurd on the surface—and we roast it hard—but we also steelman their perspective before tearing it apart.
We explore how this philosophy ties into extreme gentle parenting trends (no timeouts without consent? No punishments?), the misuse of "consent" as the sole argument against adult-minor relationships (spoiler: it's not about consent; it's about developmental stages and guardianship), and why removing natural threats/fears from kids' lives might fuel modern anxiety epidemics.
From ritualized diaper changes that feel suspiciously fetish-adjacent, to using clinical terms like "vulva/penis/anus" on infants vs. fun family euphemisms like "doty" and "flippy," we share our unfiltered parenting stories—including epic blowouts, bribery for potty training, and why our kids aren't anxious wrecks despite (or because of) our pragmatic, authoritative style.
We also touch on Krampus, ancestral fear exposure, nursing home STDs, and why suburb-raised girls invent existential threats. Plus: a chaotic domestic tangent about poop smells, manga villains, and who’s making dinner.
If you're tired of overthinking parenting and want a raw, evidence-based take on why kids actually need guardians (not mini-adults), this one's for you.
Timestamps below. Like, subscribe, and drop your wildest parenting horror story in the comments.
#Parenting #Consent #GentleParentingCritique #PragmaticParenting
Timestamps
[00:00] Intro: The viral "ask your baby for diaper consent" story from Deakin University (Australia)
[01:30] Steel-manning their argument + why it links to teen sex-ed consent lessons
[03:45] Why "consent" isn't the real reason we protect minors (animals analogy, cognition comparison to elderly/handicapped)
[05:20] Developmental stages: Kids are wired for guardianship, not autonomy—removing threats/fears backfires
[07:10] Reading the Deakin article: Ritualized changes, "get down to their level," no distractions, eye contact
[10:45] Our real diaper-changing reality: Sheep-shearing speed, turd-flinging toddlers, bribery for potty training
[14:30] The creepy undertones: Why ritualizing + clinical terms feels off (sexualization risk, AB/DL vibes?)
[18:00] Hug/kiss consent? Playful toddler "no means yes" games vs. forced positivity
[21:00] Anatomical terms vs. euphemisms ("doty/flippy")—why sexualizing baby parts is weird
[24:30] Broader gentle parenting failures: No apologies, no sharing, validation → anxiety/entitlement
[28:45] Real parent regret stories: From permissive chaos to authoritative structure working better
[32:00] Our low-anxiety kids + exposure to real risks (mice, danger play, Krampus)
[36:00] Tangent: Poop smells (buttered popcorn?!), maternal instincts, Home Alone mom energy
[40:00] Closing chaos: Dinner plans, manga villains, and why pragmatic parenting wins
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.