Feminists Prefer to Date Misogynists: The Science
February 19, 2026
26,034
1,210
747
7.52%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Based Camp with Simone Malcolm Collins Episodes Around February 19, 2026
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
58:40Now PlayingFeminists Prefer to Date Misogynists: The Science
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelMalcolm and Simone revisit studies showing that men who report higher mating success (more consensual partners, perceived attractiveness) are also more likely to self-report coercive/forceful sexual behaviors — a bimodal pattern (high-success "Chads" and low-status desperate men). They argue this isn't always genuine assault but often experienced men misreading "token resistance" in consensual kink/dominance play, or contextual factors where women don't label or report it negatively. They contrast this with Red Pill misconceptions: women don't crave gruff, aggressive "dread game" misogynists but rather charismatic, self-assured, ruthless-pragmatic, "fey/vampire-like" pretty-boy types (e.g., host club hosts, David Bowie, Johnny Depp, Justin Bieber archetypes) who show intense interest, build women up, and display confidence without crude dominance. They tie in benevolent sexism (protective/pedestal beliefs) appealing more than hostile sexism, prestige over brute dominance for long-term appeal, and dark triad traits as adaptive for short-term mating but maladaptive long-term. The episode frames much of it through re-examining their own early dating (Malcolm's blunt/pragmatic "dread" approach, plans not to commit, pushing Simone's career/life strategy), concluding that real attraction stems from aligned values, assertiveness, interest in her goals, and pragmatic effectiveness — not cruelty or performative misogyny. It ends casually with family interruptions and dinner plans.
8 major theme timestamps (approximate, based on transcript cues; these are not exact video times but aligned to content shifts around the provided [timestamps]):
[00:00:00 – 00:02:00] Personal recontextualization of their early relationship — Malcolm admits to early "dark triad" treatment; discussion of coercion studies showing successful men admit more force/coercion; bimodal distribution (high-success vs. low-status men).
[00:02:00 – 00:05:00] Evolutionary logic behind coercive behavior in top/bottom men; Red Pill misunderstanding — women want "fey/vampire bastard" (host club pretty boys), not gruff aggressive "bastards"; host club anecdotes and extreme examples.
[00:05:00 – 00:10:00] Review of studies on coercive men having higher mating success (e.g., self-reported partners/attractiveness correlate with admitted force); adolescent promiscuity predicts later coercion; "Chads" casually coercive due to experience.
[00:10:00 – 00:18:00] Nuance on surveys — experienced men better read "playful resistance" vs. real no; personal first-date story reframed as potentially "progressive SA" but enthusiastically consensual; experience dulls sensitivity (callousness as adaptation, not pathology).
[00:18:00 – 00:25:00] Dark triad traits link to short-term success but decrease in long-term/monogamy; their early dynamic — Malcolm's pragmatic/exploitative plans, Simone as "workhorse" side piece; recontextualizing "dread" as blunt honesty + life coaching.
[00:25:00 – 00:35:00] Critiquing dark triad misconceptions (not insecurity/narcissism, but ruthless pragmatism, confidence, assertiveness); building women up (career/life strategy pushes) as attractive; prestige/charisma brute dominance.
[00:35:00 – 00:45:00] Lower-IQ/convicted rapists vs. undetected higher-functioning ones; women prefer prestige/respect over coercive dominance (short-term exceptions); intense male interest/hunger as female erotic analog to male predation fantasies.
[00:45:00 – end (~00:56:00+)] Benevolent sexism appeals (protection/pedestal); practical takeaways — be prolific/assertive/experienced, show genuine interest in her goals/values; marriage as business partnership with aligned values/hard work; not about performative dark triad cruelty.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.









