How Justice Clarence Thomas violated federal law by not recusing himself in Lindsey Graham Appeal
October 25, 2022
252,710
15,135
2,974
7.17%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Ben Meiselas Episodes Around October 25, 2022
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
12:49Now PlayingHow Justice Clarence Thomas violated federal law by not recusing himself in Lindsey Graham Appeal
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelMeidas Network Host Ben Meiselas discusses how Clarence Thomas likely violated federal law and the United States Constitution Due Process Clause by not not recusing himself in Lindsey Graham’s emergency application to the Supreme Court to avoid testifying before the Fulton County Special Grand Jury. Federal law and the due process clause require recusal where there is an appearance that a Justice’s spouse has an interest in the outcome of a ruling.
Donate to MeidasTouch PAC
Support the MeidasTouch Media Network
Buy MeidasTouch Merch
Follow MeidasTouch on Twitter
Follow MeidasTouch on Facebook
Follow MeidasTouch on Instagram
Follow MeidasTouch on TikTok
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.