November 29, 2023
313,497
19,154
936
6.41%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
14:32Now PlayingTrumps latest gambit to delay the March 2024 DC election interference, criminal case? Argue that Jack Smith Special Counsel team should be expanded by definition to include many of the Department of Justice prosecutors trying Jan6 defendants by the thousands, and then argue that these line prosecutors statements about Trump should be used against the DOJ at trial. Michael Popok of Legal AF explains why Judge Chutkan is likely to deny the motion to expand the definition of Jack smith’s team and find that the statements made that individual jan6 defendants actions don’t absolve Trump is not inconsistent with the Special Counsel’s position in the case against Trump at all.
Visit for more!
Support the MeidasTouch Network
Add the MeidasTouch Podcast
Buy MeidasTouch Merch
Follow MeidasTouch on Twitter
Follow MeidasTouch on Facebook
Follow MeidasTouch on Instagram
Follow MeidasTouch on TikTok
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.