Sam Harris: On Interpreting Scripture | Big Think

Sam Harris: On Interpreting Scripture

New videos DAILY

Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe God spoke in metaphor.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SAM HARRIS:

Sam Harris is the author of the New York Times bestsellers, The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation. The End of Faith won the 2005 PEN Award for Nonfiction.

Mr. Harris' writing has been published in over ten languages. He and his work have been discussed in Newsweek, TIME, The New York Times, Scientific American, Rolling Stone, and many other journals. His writing has appeared in Newsweek, The Los Angeles Times, The Times (London), The Boston Globe, The Atlantic, Nature, The Annals of Neurology, and elsewhere.

Mr. Harris is a graduate in philosophy from Stanford University and holds a PhD in neuroscience from UCLA, where he studied the neural basis of belief with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). He is also a Co-Founder and CEO of Project Reason.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TRANSCRIPT:

Question: Do atheists take a literalist approach to scripture?

Sam Harris: Well this is a common criticism – the idea that the atheist if guilty of a literalist reading of Scripture no better than the reading of fundamentalist. And that it’s a very naïve way of approaching religion, and that there’s a lot more sophisticated and nuanced view of religion ______ and the atheist as disregarding that. A few problems with this. Anyone making that argument is failing to acknowledge just how many people really do approach these texts literally or functionally – whether they’re selective literalists, or literal all the way down the line. There is a . . . there are certain passages in Scripture that just cannot be read figuratively. And people really do live by the lights of what is literally laid out in these books. So you know, the Koran says “hate the infidel.” And Muslims hate the infidel because the Koran spells it out ad nauseum. Now it’s true that you can cherry pick Scripture, and you can look for all the good parts. You can ignore where it says in Leviticus where it says that if a woman is not a virgin on her wedding night, you’re supposed to stone her to death on her father’s doorstep. You can ignore that. And to my knowledge, all Jews and Christians do ignore that. In fact that’s not true. There are some Christians who actually do – you know, constructionist Christians, diminuinist Christians in the U.S. – who will say, you know, I think the penalty for adultery should be death. So there are people who have the courage of their convictions. But most of us . . . most religious people ignore those passages which really can only be read literally, and say that, “Oh, they were only appropriate for the time.” And, “They don’t apply now.” And likewise, Muslims try to have the same reading of passages that advocate holy war. Well they say, “Well these were appropriate to those battles that Mohammed was fighting; but now we don’t have to fight those battles.” This is all a good thing, but we should recognize what is . . . what’s at . . . what’s happening here. People are feeling pressure from a host of all too human concerns that having nothing, in principle, to do with God. I mean secularism, and human rights, and democracy, and scientific progress – these have made certain passages in Scripture untenable, okay? So this is coming from outside religion, and religion is now making a great show of its sophistication in kind of grappling with these pressures. Once again, this is . . . this is an example of religion losing the argument with modernity. It’s an example of . . . You know, the recent shooting at Virginia Tech. The mother of the shooter recognized that there was something wrong with her son. You know, he was suffering from some kind of mental problem. In the context of her rather doctrinary Christianity, she did not take him to a psychiatrist. She took him from church to church in search of exorcism. She actually found a church that performed an exorcism. Just picture this. There’s some . . . We have an atrocity in the making. We have a dangerously mental ill college student. We have a concerned mother whose world view about mental health is trimmed down through the keyhole of a kind of medieval Christianity. And we have a church willing to put forward its expertise in the performance of an exorcism. It would be a lot better if everyone involved had a 21st century mental health. No one has . . . Moderate people, moderate Christians, and Jews, and Muslims have to look at this situation and say, “Well there’s something wrong here. It would be better to go to...

Read the full transcript at