Katrina vanden Heuvel Explains The Nation | Big Think

Katrina vanden Heuvel Explains The Nation

New videos DAILY

Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Katrina vanden Heuvel talks about The Nation as an institution in American journalism.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Katrina vanden:

Katrina vanden Heuvel has been The Nation's editor since 1995 and publisher since 2005.

She is the co-editor of Taking Back America--And Taking Down The Radical Right (NationBooks, 2004) and, most recently, editor of The Dictionary of Republicanisms, (NationBooks, 2005)

She is a frequent commentator on American and international politics on MSNBC, CNN and PBS. Her articles have appeared in The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and The Boston Globe.

She is a recipient of Planned Parenthood's Maggie Award for her article, "Right-to-Lifers Hit Russia." The special issue she conceived and edited, "Gorbachev's Soviet Union," was awarded New York University's 1988 Olive Branch Award. Vanden Heuvel was also co-editor of Vyi i Myi, a Russian-language feminist newsletter.

She has received awards for public service from numerous groups, including The Liberty Hill Foundation, The Correctional Association and The Association for American-Russian Women. In 2003, she received the New York Civil Liberties Union's Callaway Prize for the Defense of the Right of Privacy. She is also the recipient of The American-Arab Anti-discrimination Committee's 2003 "Voices of Peace" award. Vanden Heuvel is a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, and she also serves on the board of The Institute for Women's Policy Research, The Institute for Policy Studies, The World Policy Institute, The Correctional Association of New York and The Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute.

She is a summa cum laude graduate of Princeton University, and she lives in New York City with her husband and daughter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TRANSCRIPT:

Question: What kind of magazine is The Nation?

vanden Heuvel: I think of The Nation Magazine as the anchor, but I do think of The Nation now as a multimedia enterprise. We have a website which brings 2 million people to thenation.com every month. We are investing resources. We have bloggers who don’t write for the magazine but who are writing for the website exclusively, and I think that will be important for the future, because, as I said, so many younger readers are reading on the internet. To me, what’s important is that our ideas are out there, and if it’s in the platform of the internet, so be it, but the magazine then becomes a vehicle also for the deeper essays which we do, the deeper investigative reporting, and it allows us, for example, with the report we did a few weeks ago on militia violence in New Orleans after the Hurricane Katrina to then put primary documents on the internet to deepen that story. We are doing radio and podcasts, and we are doing weekly video report, whether it’s one of the editors talking about a story they’ve edited, a writer talking about how they’ve investigated a piece and events which we then video. We did an emergency Town Hall meeting around the economic crisis at the end of last year with Naomi Klein and William Greider. We put that out there. So there’s a multimedia sensibility, but always revolving around the core ideas in the reporting mission of the magazine.

Question: How do you approach advertising?

vanden Heuvel: One thing about the internet, if I might add, is that it allows us also to tap into the community of The Nation, which is broad and broadening, and we have 38 discussion groups run by Nation readers around this country, and the internet allows us to be in touch with them, telling them questions, giving them questions and ideas. So, it’s a way of connecting to a community out there, but the ad policy of The Nation, interestingly, was crafted maybe 20 years ago by the former director of the ACLU. We always err on the side of free speech and, in that context, we are very clear that we will publish ads we don’t agree with, and we do so in the service of publishing ideas these companies might not agree with, not that we get big corporate ads. The Nation has never been ad supported like Conde Nast or some of the other major magazine corporations, but we have run over the years ads which readers disagree with, ranging from the writer Lillian Hellman doing a black llama fur ad many years ago, many years ago, maybe [3] years ago, which prompted a lot of animal rights activists to protest, to ads, public service ads or public promotional ads,

Read the full transcript at