October 31, 2017
10,151
236
23
2.55%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
3:11Now PlayingHope: Why We Invest All Our Energies into a Future We Can't Predict
Watch the newest video from Big Think
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive videos
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Living in the moment is an exception, not the rule. So why do we invest so much energy into a future we can't predict, control, or anticipate? It turns out our happiness may depend on it. There is something deeply biological about our ability, and our need, to control the future. Despite the fact that the future is precisely what foils our most carefully laid plans, we go on planning for it. An emphasis on future planning is even a vital part of raising children. A great deal of our own well being depends on grooming future generations to hope, to anticipate, to plan.
This video is part of a collaborative series with the Hope & Optimism initiative, which has supported interdisciplinary academic research into under-explored aspects of hope and optimism. Discover more at hopeoptimism.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VICTORIA MCGEER:
Victoria McGeer is a research scholar and lecturer at Princeton University. She took her B.A. in Philosophy and Government at Dartmouth College and her Ph.D. in Philosophy at the University of Toronto. She specializes in the philosophy of language and more prominently in the philosophy of mind.
In 1992, she took up a position as Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University, but took leave of absence shortly thereafter in order to do further postdoctoral work in Alison Gopnik’s developmental psychology laboratory at the University of California at Berkeley (funded under an award from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada).
McGeer decided to leave her teaching position at Vanderbilt in 1998 in order to pursue further interdisciplinary work as an independent scholar, and in 2000 was appointed as a Senior Member of the McDonnell Project on Philosophy and the Neurosciences (led by Professor Kathleen Akins). In 2004 she was appointed Research Scholar at the University Center for Human Values and Lecturer in the Dept. of Philosophy at Princeton University, receiving tenure in 2007.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:
VICTORIA MCGEER: What is it about our way of inhabiting our own agency that makes us so directed towards future states of affairs that we don’t completely control whether or not they come about? So these are things that may happen. They’re things that we can work towards, but we never have any guarantee that they will happen. And yet we invest a lot of our energy in that. I’ve come to think of that as a very special and characteristic feature of our own human agency, that we are structured in that way. We just do not have very fulfilling or happy human lives if we’re not directing our agency, our energy towards those anticipated events, hoped for events.
When we think about human development we’re a very atypical kind of species insofar as when we’re born, unlike most other species, we have very little self-standing capacity to survive in the world. We need other people. We need our parents. We need other caregivers to help us develop the kinds of skills or capacities we need to be able to survive, to be able to flourish in our world. So we rely on others to give us those skills, to teach us those skills, to enable us to become fully fledged autonomous individuals. And that process is a long drawn out one and it involves a certain important relationship with our caregivers that they’re able to structure our environment in such a way that they bring us little by little into certain rather complex sorts of engagements with the world, allowing us little by little to build up our capacities for linguistic engagement, for the kind of skills we need to play with toys. You know when you think about very early development and the way a mother may be interacting with her child. Showing the child how to handle a toy or something so the child now comes to be able to do it for him or herself.
Those are very small acts but those are the way we build up all our skills through our long protracted development. And that’s what psychologists have called parental scaffolding that we treat our infants as if they’re capable of doing things that they’re not quite yet capable of but we’re structuring a world for them in which they’re able to try and explore their limitations and maybe be frustrated at times. But slowly, little by little, learn how to do things for themselves that they couldn’t do initially.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.