Bloomberg News
@Bloomberg-News·2.8M subscribers·40.1K videos
Texas Judge Temporarily Blocks Biden's 100-Day Deportation Freeze
Posted
January 27, 2021
Views
85,576
Likes
1,836
Comments
888
Engagement
January 27, 2021
85,576
1,836
888
3.18%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
3:11Now PlayingPresident Joe Biden suffered his first major court setback after a federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked the new administration’s plan to pause deportations of undocumented immigrants for 100 days.
Tuesday’s ruling by U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton is a preliminary victory for Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican. Texas sued just two days after Biden’s inauguration, taking aim at a measure seen as the first step by the new president to reverse Donald Trump’s harsh immigration policies.
The decision is a sign of the legal battles to come. Just as attorneys general from Democratic-leaning states like California and New York flooded the Trump administration with lawsuits seeking to block key policies, Republican-led states are now poised to return the favor, potentially backed by the massive complement of judges Trump and the former Republican Senate majority managed to appoint over the past four years.
Tipton, a Trump appointee himself, said the suit “establishes a substantial risk of imminent and irreparable harm to Texas” from the planned freeze, which was announced in a Jan. 20 memorandum and was due to take effect two days later. His order blocks the Department of Homeland Security from immediately halting deportations until a hearing over whether to issue a longer-lasting order that could doom the president’s effort to halt removals.
The judge also said the order applied nationwide, taking a step Republicans often blasted when it was granted against the Trump administration.
“Nationwide injunctions of executive action are a topic of fierce and ongoing debate in both the courts and the legal academy,” Tipton said in his order. Even so, he ruled that the Biden administration “must be enjoined from executing the January 20 Memorandum’s 100-day pause on the removal of aliens in every place defendants would have jurisdiction to implement it.”
A White House spokesperson said Biden remained committed to implementing a freeze and was confident the measure would ultimately be ruled to be an appropriate pause allowing a thorough review of policies and enforcement priorities, taking into account public safety and nation security concerns.
The Biden administration is pressing ahead with revising immigration policies. The Justice Department on Tuesday issued a memo rescinding the Trump administration’s “zero-tolerance” approach to immigration case, saying it was restoring the discretion of prosecutors to make determinations based on the circumstances of individual cases.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose office filed the suit over the deportation freeze, hailed Tipton’s decision. “A near-complete suspension of deportations would only serve to endanger Texans and undermine federal law,” he said in a statement. Paxton, a Republican who filed a suit challenging the 2020 election results, also vowed to continue to defend Texas “against the unlawful and unconstitutional actions of President Biden and his administration.”
The judge said during an initial hearing last week that his decision on the temporary restraining order should not be interpreted to hint at how he’ll rule on the state’s bid for an injunction. But in his order Tuesday Tipton said he thought the freeze’s implementation potentially violated federal administrative law and, more substantively, a law requiring deportations to be carried out 90 days after being ordered.
Texas argues in the lawsuit that the freeze breaches a purported commitment by the Department of Homeland Security to consult with the state before making any changes to immigration enforcement -- a deal Texas reached with the government less than two weeks before Trump left office.
The Justice Department argued the agreement is an illegal attempt to tie the hands of the new administration and isn’t enforceable. Tipton said his order wasn’t based on the agreement but that the validity of the deal must be hashed out later on.
“The issues implicated by that Agreement are of such gravity and constitutional import that they require further development of the record and briefing prior to addressing the merits,” the judge wrote.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Bloomberg Quicktake brings you live global news and original shows spanning business, technology, politics and culture. Make sense of the stories changing your business and your world.
To watch complete coverage on Bloomberg Quicktake 24/7, visit or watch on Apple TV, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, Fire TV and Android TV on the Bloomberg app.
Have a story to tell? Fill out this survey for a chance to have it featured on Bloomberg Quicktake
Connect with us on…
Breaking News on YouTube
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
