Bloomberg Podcasts
Bloomberg Podcasts
@bloombergpodcasts·503K subscribers·32.4K videos

Google Partially Loses US Advertising Tech Antitrust Case

Posted

April 17, 2025

Views

24,537

Likes

109

Comments

27

Engagement

0.55%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Google illegally monopolized some online advertising technology markets, according to a federal judge, whose ruling marked the latest antitrust setback for the company and a challenge to its main source of revenue.

US District Judge Leonie Brinkema found on Thursday that the Alphabet Inc. unit violated antitrust law in the markets for advertising exchanges and tools used by websites to sell ad space, known as ad servers. But she said the company didn’t meet the definition of a monopoly for a third market of tools used by advertisers to buy display ads.

Alphabet shares quickly sank as much as 3.2% on the ruling, then slightly pared their losses. The stock was down 1.1% at $153.78 at 1:10 p.m. in New York.

Brinkema’s decision marked the second time in a year that Google was found by a court to be an illegal monopolist. A trial begins Monday in Washington on a remedy after the company was found to monopolize the online search market. The Justice Department is seeking to force Alphabet to sell off its Chrome browser.

In the ad technology case, Brinkema wrote in her 115-page opinion Thursday that “Google has willfully engaged in a series of anticompetitive acts to acquire and maintain monopoly power in the publisher ad server and ad exchange markets for open-web display advertising.” For over a decade, Google pushed web publishers to use its tools that both placed ads on websites and help manage their advertising business, the judge found.

The judge found that Google “further entrenched its monopoly power” through anticompetitive policies on its customers and by eliminating desirable product features. “In addition to depriving rivals of the ability to compete, this exclusionary conduct substantially harmed Google’s publisher customers, the competitive process, and, ultimately, consumers of information on the open web,” she wrote.

Brinkema said she will set separate court proceedings to determine a possible remedy.

The Justice Department and a group of states sued Google in 2023, arguing the company illegally monopolized three separate markets related to the technology used for online display advertising: ad servers, exchanges and networks.

In their initial lawsuit, the Justice Department and states sought to have Google’s ad tech business broken up, but Brinkema’s ruling set a high bar for that. She found that the company’s acquisitions in that sector — of DoubleClick and Admeld — were not themselves anticompetitive.

The Justice Department “still faces serious challenges in getting a divestiture, but it is possible,” said Justin Teresi, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst. “I would expect Google to argue that an entire portion of its business shouldn’t be divested when there was only litigation on an aspect of it.”

Google said it would appeal the part of the case that it lost. “We disagree with the Court’s decision regarding our publisher tools,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs. “Publishers have many options and they choose Google because our ad tech tools are simple, affordable and effective.”

A Justice Department spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Jonathan Kanter, the Justice Department antitrust chief under former President Joe Biden, said on LinkedIn that the ruling “is a huge victory for antitrust enforcement, the media industry, and the free and open internet.”

“Google is now an illegal monopolist twice over,” Kanter wrote.

Much of the Justice Department’s case focused on attacking Google’s past acquisitions, including DoubleClick, which worked with websites to sell ads. Brinkema agreed.

“Google’s bolstering of its publisher-facing business through the DoubleClick acquisition helped it establish a dominant position on both sides of the ad tech stack,” she wrote.

Bloomberg's Jen Rie and Justin Teresi join to break down the case.

--------

Watch Bloomberg Radio LIVE on YouTube

Weekdays 7am-6pm ET

Follow us on X

Subscribe to our Podcasts:

Bloomberg Daybreak

Bloomberg Surveillance

Bloomberg Intelligence

Balance of Power

Bloomberg Businessweek

Listen on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app:

Apple CarPlay

Android Auto

Visit our YouTube channels:

Bloomberg Podcasts

Bloomberg Television

Bloomberg Originals

Guests & Subjects Covered

Alphabet IncNew York BrinkemasThe Justice DepartmentJustice DepartmentJustin TeresiBloomberg IntelligenceLee-Anne Mulholland GooglesA Justice Department

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.