Both Sides
Both Sides
@BothSides5198·8.4K subscribers·68 videos

Candace Owens Defends Andrew Tate Past - BOTH SIDES

Posted

March 13, 2026

Views

3,371

Likes

485

Comments

81

Engagement

16.79%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

Something strange keeps happening every time Candace Owens talks about the past.

One minute the message is clear: people change, you can’t judge someone by who they were ten years ago.

The next minute the same standard disappears the moment the target is someone she disagrees with.

And that’s where things start getting interesting.

Because during a conversation about Andrew Tate, Candace made a very strong argument. She said digging into someone’s past to judge who they are today isn’t fair. That people grow. That people evolve. That context matters.

At first glance, that sounds reasonable.

But then you start asking questions.

Because the moment that rule is applied consistently… a lot of narratives start collapsing.

If going back ten years is unfair…

Then why do it to others?

If people deserve the benefit of growth…

Then why are certain figures constantly dragged through old history?

And that’s where the internet started noticing something.

The standard seems to shift depending on the person.

When the conversation is about controversial figures like Andrew Tate, the message becomes about redemption, growth, and fairness.

But when the conversation turns toward political rivals, critics, or public enemies… suddenly the past becomes evidence again.

So the real question becomes:

Is this about principles?

Or is this about strategy?

In this video we break down exactly what was said, the context around it, and why so many people online are now debating whether this is a contradiction or something deeper.

We’re not here to play detective.

We’re simply putting the statements side-by-side and asking the same question viewers across the internet are asking:

Do the rules apply to everyone… or only certain people?

Watch the clips carefully.

Listen to the arguments.

And decide for yourself.

Is this consistency…

or a double standard?

Drop your thoughts in the comments. 👇

Do you think Candace Owens is being misunderstood?

Or do you think the criticism is fair?

Let’s talk.

#candaceowens

#andrewtate

#politics

#internetdebate

#politicalcommentary

#mediaanalysis

#controversy

#viralpolitics

#debate

#internetculture

#commentary

#trending

#newsdiscussion

#politicaldebate

#socialcommentary

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Click Here To Donate To 2 STRONG

✅Cashapp: $2strongpodcast

✅Business Inquiries: 2strongpodcast@gmail.com

We also have a P.O. Box

Fair Media

P.O. Box 1195

Granger, Indiana, 46530

Guests & Subjects Covered

Candace OwensAndrew Tate CandaceAndrew TateSTRONG CashappBusiness InquiriesGranger Indiana

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.