March 7, 2017
18,234
900
194
6.00%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
I have often been told, generally in old undergraduate history classes and in non-professional historical settings, that it is not the role of the historian to say whether past events were 'right' or 'wrong'. But this logic is generally only applied to very particular instances, and exceptions are always made for those most over-used examples of Hitler, Stalin, etc.
So, this begs the question, is it possible to pass judgement on the moral agents of the past? And, if so, is it a reasonable or responsible thing to do?
**Articles mentioned to be posted** -
-
- -
- -
This video was made in support of The Native Oak. Learn more about our educational mission here:
If you'd like to support the channel, please consider giving on Patreon,
You can follow me on social media too!
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.