Tyler Robinson and who he hated

Charlie Kirk

It is really critical that people understand what the ballistics findings mean in Charlie's case.

That bullet went into Charlie, did not exit, and was mangled in the process, and became a bullet fragment.

Bullets don't tell the story in this instance. Casings do.

You see there are marks left on a casing (casings hold the bullet) when they are ejected by a gun. These are caused by the extractor and ejector of a gun. There are also little impressions made by the firing pin that are unique.

That is what is used to determine what gun shot a cartridge.

Can bullets also be linked to a particular gun via examining the rifling striations? Yes, but that requires a bullet to be intact for comparison.

Charlie's bullet upon removal was more of a fragment, not a round.

Tyler Robinson is accused to assassinating Charlie.

The bullet fragment not matching Tyler's gun is not exculpatory evidence, it was expected due to the state of the bullet.

Also, the ammunition was 8 years old. That is very old for ammunition and could affect the primers and integrity of the projectiles and their performance.

Finally, I thought it important to understand the shot, but I am posting this post without the shot because some prefer not seeing the violence.

I will replace it with one of my favorite Charlie Kirk hits.

#charliekirkshot

#TylerRobinson