Brother Counsel
@brothercounsel·54.3K subscribers·649 videos
Karen Read Federal Case! Why Anti-SLAPP Should Not Apply! Trial Lawyer Breaks it Down!
Posted
May 27, 2026
Views
12,755
Likes
976
Comments
146
Engagement
May 27, 2026
12,755
976
146
8.80%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
38:53Now PlayingTrial Lawyer Martin E. Radner breaks down why Anti-SLAPP should not apply in Karen Read's Federal case!
Here is the Link for Part 1 of Erie Analysis in Karen Read case!
Here is the Link for Part 2 of the Erie Analysis in Karen Read case!
Here is the Link for Part 3 of the Erie Analysis in Karen Read case!
For donations PayPal brothercounsel99@gmail.com
venmo @brothercounsel
Follow me on
X
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Get your brother counsel swag!
Support the channel and look great at the same time!
Please subscribe! ?sub_confirmation=1
#brothercounsel
For inquiries, please email brothercounsel99@gmail.com
All statements and opinions included in this presentation are for educational and entertainment purposes and should not be construed as legal advice.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
