Canadian Intelligence Eh
@canadianintelligenceeh·2.6K subscribers·472 videos
Why would someone LIE about being in a terrorist attack? | Phil Gurski
Posted
April 23, 2021
Views
114
Likes
7
Comments
5
Engagement
April 23, 2021
114
7
5
10.53%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
10:35Now PlayingIt is safe to say that most people would avoid being anywhere near a terrorist attack. Some, however, seem to have a fascination with these events to the point where they distort their own experiences. Borealis weighs in on this curious phenomenon.
Read: Port Authority Bomber Is Sentenced to Life in Prison
Subscribe to get earlyaccess to videos, ressources and exclusive content
Phil Gurski is the President and CEO of Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting Ltd. and Programme Director for the Security, Economics and Technology (SET) hub at the University of Ottawa’s Professional Development Institute (PDI). He worked as a senior strategic analyst at CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) from 2001-2015, specializing in violent Islamist-inspired homegrown terrorism and radicalisation.
►Listen to my podcast ''Canadian Intelligence Eh!''
►Email - borealisrisk@gmail.com
►Check Phil Gurski's latest books
Chapters
Hosted by Phil Gurski
Edited by Jean-Baptiste Pelland-Goulet
Produced by Borealis Threat and Risk Consulting
#QuickHits #PhilGurski #Bataclan #PortAuthorityBomber
Port Authority Bomber Is Sentenced to Life in Prison. Akayed Ullah, who detonated a pipe bomb in a crowded subway tunnel near Times Square in the name of ISIS in 2017, became radicalized online. On Thursday, Mr. Ullah, 31, was sentenced to life imprisonment by a federal judge who rejected his request for mercy. “This was a calculated, premeditated decision to kill as many people as you could,” the judge, Richard J. Sullivan, said, “all in the name of an organization that is dedicated to spreading terror.” The fact that Mr. Ullah had failed to execute his plan did not make him any less culpable or his intent less sinister, the judge said. “This is about as serious a crime as there is,” Judge Sullivan added. Two victims of the attack also submitted letters that described its lasting impact on their lives. One, David Wall, who had testified at Mr. Ullah’s trial about being left with shrapnel in his right leg and having serious hearing problems, wrote to the judge about the anxiety he still feels when he enters the subway and rides crowded trains.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
