The Conditional Premiss of the Moral Argument - Peoples, Rauser, Hannestad, Moore
March 25, 2017
1,604
41
15
3.49%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Capturing Christianity Episodes Around March 25, 2017
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
1:54:06Now PlayingThe Conditional Premiss of the Moral Argument - Peoples, Rauser, Hannestad, Moore
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelThis discussion features two theists, Glenn Peoples and Randal Rauser, and two atheists, Lance Hannestad and Graham Seth Moore, discussing the conditional premise of the moral argument. All participants affirm the view that moral facts exist and are real, the disagreement is found over the grounding of these moral facts (natural vs supernatural).
The theists contend that God is required to ground moral facts, while the atheists contend the opposite: a satisfactory account of moral ontology can be given purely from a naturalistic perspective.
For more information
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.