Cenk Uygur
@TheYoungTurks·6.5M subscribers·72.8K videos
Was Rand Paul a Winner or a Loser?
Posted
March 8, 2013
Views
30,119
Likes
1,001
Comments
390
Engagement
4.62%
March 8, 2013
30,119
1,001
390
4.62%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
6:41Now Playing"Rand Paul finally ended his 13-hour filibuster of John Brennan, Obama's nominee to head the CIA, at 12:40 a.m. this morning. Whatever you think of the specifics of Paul's speech, his filibuster was a good thing — it sparked public discussion about Obama's drone policies and the weak legal rationale for targeted killing the administration has publicly released."*
Rand Paul undertook a 13-hour filibuster of John Brennan for CIA director based on his and President Obama's assertion that lethal drone strikes could be used on U.S. soil without due process in a time without an imminent attack. The filibuster was not successful, but it's making waves in the political and media worlds. Was Paul a winner? Or a lower? Cenk Uygur breaks it down.
*Read more from Washington Post:
Support The Young Turks by Subscribing
Like Us on Facebook:
Follow Us on Twitter
Support TYT for FREE by doing your Amazon shopping through this link (bookmark it!)
Buy TYT Merch
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
