“Woke” Investors Funding China’s Human Rights Abuses
December 26, 2022
143,382
11,003
959
8.34%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
China Uncensored Episodes Around December 26, 2022
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
15:17Now Playing“Woke” Investors Funding China’s Human Rights Abuses
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelThere has been a big movement in the investment world to screen investments based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria. While it's good investors that care about the impact of their investments, what's not good is that those same "woke" investors are funding China's human rights abuses and environmental destruction. In this episode of China Uncensored, we look at the "responsible" investing strategy of some large investment funds, what Chinese companies those funds are invested in, and why those companies are bad investments for anyone who cares about ESG.
20 Signs China's Pollution Has Reached Apocalyptic Levels | China Uncensored
China Is a Democracy Now!
YouTube demonetizes our channels, we need your support!
We also accept bitcoin!
Buy our merchandise!
China Uncensored on Odysee
China Uncensored on Rumble
Make sure to share this video with your friends!
______________________________
Subscribe for updates:
youtube.com/ChinaUncensored?sub_confirmation=1
______________________________
And check out the China Unscripted podcast!
#China
______________________________
© All Rights Reserved.
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.