Kamala Harris Fought The Supreme Court To Prevent Citizens From Owning Handguns
September 28, 2024
175,799
14,956
1,238
9.21%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Colion Noir Episodes Around September 28, 2024
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
6:50Kamala's Campaign Drops Bombshell About Her Shooting Intruders On Oprah
3:34Now PlayingKamala Harris Fought The Supreme Court To Prevent Citizens From Owning Handguns
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelDuring her tenure as California Attorney General, Kamala Harris opposed the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). In this case, the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects individuals' right to own firearms for self-defense, particularly within one's home.
Her opposition centered on a few key arguments:
1. Public Safety Concerns: Harris emphasized that local governments need the ability to enact reasonable regulations on firearms to protect public safety. She argued that allowing broad gun rights, as affirmed in Heller, could lead to more gun violence, particularly in urban areas.
2. Collective vs. Individual Right: She incorrectly supported the view that the Second Amendment was intended to protect a collective right tied to state militias rather than an individual's right to own firearms. This interpretation would allow more regulation of private firearm ownership where they can ban citizens from owning handguns in their homes.
3. Judicial Precedent: Harris referenced earlier judicial precedents that allowed for greater restrictions on gun ownership, arguing that those restrictions were consistent with public safety goals and constitutional law before Heller reinterpreted the Second Amendment as an individual right.
4. State and Local Autonomy: Harris has argued that states and municipalities should retain the power to regulate guns as they see fit, tailored to their unique needs and public safety conditions.
Her overall stance is unconstitutional, as is proven by District of Columbia v. Heller (2008).
NEW Need Money For Pew Pew Design
Need Money For Guns
Also, Click HERE for my favorite in-ear totally wireless hearing protection That has 6x hearing enhancement, 10 hours of use, and they're easy to use:
Let me know your thoughts in the comments!
📲 Subscribe to @ColionNoir Here
➡️ Join Our 2A Membership Club here on YOUTUBE and get these perks:
➡️ Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
➡️ Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On YouTube & Help Protect The Second Amendment
➡️ FREE BOOK - If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:
UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Truth Social
Youtube Shorts
#GunControl SecondAmendment #GunRights #KamalaHarris
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.