May 17, 2024
133
1
0.75%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
46:06Now PlayingPODCAST: The marathon trial of California vs. Robert Durst is now in the hands of the jury, who as this podcast was recorded were deliberating the fate of the man accused of murdering his friend Susan Berman over 20 years ago. The defense alleges that the prosecution harassed an elderly, ill man with memory problems to manipulate the jury's emotions, to cover for a lack of forensic evidence. The prosecution insists that they don't require that kind of evidence, as Durst's own words alone are enough to secure a conviction. Court TV’s Ted Rowlands and Vinnie Politan will examine both strategies and make their prediction of what will happen when the jury finishes deliberations. Get the latest updates on Court TV and CourtTV.com and tune in to see Vinnie Politan and the entire Court TV team review each day’s testimony on Closing Arguments weeknights from 8pm to 11pm.
To see more of our coverage of the Jinx Murder trial closing arguments, click here ().
To see the verdict in the CA v. Robert Durst trial, click here ().
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today
Join the Investigation Newsletter
Court TV Podcast
FOLLOW THE CASE:
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE
HOW TO FIND COURT TV
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.