Supreme Court News: Conversion Therapy Speech Ruling & Birthright Citizenship Showdown
April 4, 2026
2,658
247
27
10.31%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Crime Talk Episodes Around April 4, 2026
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
12:22Now PlayingSupreme Court News: Conversion Therapy Speech Ruling & Birthright Citizenship Showdown
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelSupreme Court News update, we’re covering two major developments with potentially far-reaching constitutional implications.
First, we break down the Supreme Court’s 8-1 decision in Chiles v. Salazar, a case involving Colorado’s law regulating certain counseling conversations with minors. The Court held that, as applied to licensed counselors’ talk therapy, the law may amount to viewpoint-based speech regulation and must face strict scrutiny under the First Amendment. The ruling draws a sharp distinction between regulating professional conduct and regulating protected speech.
We also examine the Court’s latest birthright citizenship arguments, where the justices questioned the legality of President Trump’s January 2025 executive order seeking to deny automatic citizenship to some children born in the United States unless a parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. During oral argument, the Court raised concerns about the text and history of the 14th Amendment, the scope of executive power, the role of nationwide injunctions, and the practical consequences of changing a longstanding understanding of citizenship.
One case is already decided. The other is still pending. Together, they show a Court deeply engaged with questions of constitutional text, free speech, executive authority, and the limits of government power.
In this video, we walk through what the justices said, what stood out most, and why both cases could have significant legal consequences going forward.
#SupremeCourt #SCOTUS #SupremeCourtNews #FirstAmendment #BirthrightCitizenship
🛍️ CRIME TALK SHOP & PARTNERS
Crime Talk Store
Crime Talk Academy
Run a Background Check
Emergency Food Supply
Amazon Favorites
🛡️ OFFICIAL DISCOUNT CODES
Police Magnum — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off
Invisawear Jewelry — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off
Baked in Colorado 40% off Pet CBD
🤝 JOIN THE COMMUNITY
Patreon (exclusive content)
Official site
X (Twitter): @CrimeTalkPod
Instagram / TikTok: @CrimeTalkWithScottReisch
Miss Winnie (IG/TikTok): @MissWinnieTheBulldog
LEGAL VAULT
Fair Use: Clips may be used for commentary, criticism, and educational purposes (see Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) and Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)).
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. I’m a lawyer — but I’m not your lawyer. Nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship.
Business inquiries: CrimeTalk@ReischLawFirm.com
1490 West 121st Ave., Suite 202, Denver, CO 80234
#TrueCrime
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.