BLAKE LIVELY DEFIES JUDGE'S ORDER—Her Revenge Scheme BLOWS UP in Court!
September 30, 2025
47,537
3,106
350
7.27%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Katie Joy Episodes Around September 30, 2025
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
17:31Now PlayingBLAKE LIVELY DEFIES JUDGE'S ORDER—Her Revenge Scheme BLOWS UP in Court!
YouTube Description
as posted by the channel#blakelively #justinbaldoni #itendswithus
Blake Lively just filed a motion that looks less like law and more like a revenge play aimed at Justin Baldoni. We break down why this premature filing screams PR— and why the judge may crush her attempt to punish Baldoni.
Support the Channel By Becoming a Member:
Follow Katie Joy on Social Media:
Facebook:
Disclaimer:
Without a Crystal Ball is a commentary channel. The views expressed by Katie Joy are her opinions and should not be considered fact. Katie Joy discusses trending topics, current events, reality tv & More. This channel is for your entertainment. Please make sure you conduct your own research on any topics to verify any information.
All Clips Obtained through TLC YouTube & Used under Fair Use:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:
“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”
THIS VIDEO AND OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL IN GENERAL MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH WE BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Claims
13 claims extractedBlake Lively filed premature motion for damages
FEHA claims lack jurisdiction outside California
Judge failed to establish applicable state law
Blake's motion violates procedural requirements
Conflicting state laws create choice of law problem
Federal judges rarely award damages under new state statutes
Blake asks judge to apply unprecedented legal theories
Blake repackaged sanctions motions for PR purposes
Judge relied on unpublished cases lacking precedent
Judge justified use of unpublished cases as persuasive authority
Judge stretched law to dismiss cases
Blake ignoring judge's orders and embarrassing herself
Blake's motion filed in bad faith
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.