Katie Joy
@withoutacrystalball·479K subscribers·4.1K videos
Blake Lively’s ILLEGAL Audio EVIDENCE Problem Just Got WAY Worse with SHOCKING ORDER
Posted
October 17, 2025
Views
50,541
Likes
2,908
Comments
446
Engagement
October 17, 2025
50,541
2,908
446
6.64%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
14:00Now Playing#️⃣ #BlakeLively #ItEndsWithUs #JustinBaldoni
Blake Lively has been ordered by Judge Liman to hand over the missing audio file that she claimed supported her motion for fees and damages. The judge set a strict deadline for Monday, but the audio remains unauthenticated and was never properly filed with the court.
Now the court wants the physical CD turned over to the clerk’s office so the public and the judge can finally access the file that was missing from her original submission. This comes after months of confusion over evidence that Blake’s legal team referenced but never provided.
Will she meet the Monday deadline? Or will this delay raise even more questions about what’s really on that recording?
Support the Channel By Becoming a Member:
Follow Katie Joy on Social Media:
Facebook:
Disclaimer:
Without a Crystal Ball is a commentary channel. The views expressed by Katie Joy are her opinions and should not be considered fact. Katie Joy discusses trending topics, current events, reality tv & More. This channel is for your entertainment. Please make sure you conduct your own research on any topics to verify any information.
All Clips Obtained through TLC YouTube & Used under Fair Use:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:
“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”
THIS VIDEO AND OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL IN GENERAL MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH WE BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.
Blake claims Sarowitz threatened to spend millions to destroy her
Audio recorded without consent of Sarowitz by director
Blake's attorneys failed to file audio with court initially
Judge discovered court never received copy of audio evidence
Audio must be authenticated with chain of custody documentation
Audio lacks proper authentication and recording method documentation
Audio may not be admissible at trial even if released
Wayfarer's lack of opposition suggests audio authenticity
Judge denies New York Times motion for final judgment
Consolidated cases retain separate identities for appeal purposes
Judge orders Blake to provide audio CD by Monday deadline
Blake's handling of audio suggests motion was performative PR stunt
Blake may be avoiding legal liability by using clerk for distribution
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
