Why Comey Indictment Matters /Scott Horton & Lt Col Daniel Davis

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

Scott Horton lays out a sweeping accusation that former FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, and others at the top of the intelligence community conspired beginning in late 2015 or early 2016 to frame Donald Trump for treason with Russia. According to the speaker, this wasn’t primarily Hillary Clinton’s idea but Brennan’s, with Comey joining in first and Clinton’s team later “embellishing the lies.” He claims newly declassified documents and the Durham report show that Comey even shut down the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s missing 30,000 emails to prevent his own agents from uncovering the “Clinton plan” to smear Trump.

He accuses Comey and Brennan of knowingly allowing a false narrative to persist by pretending not to know exculpatory facts, leaking to the press thousands of times, and feeding a quarter-million media stories about Trump–Russia “collusion” that were all baseless. He argues the FBI refused to interview key figures such as Carter Page precisely because they knew Page would clear himself and undermine their narrative.

The speaker contends that Comey’s decision in late October 2016 to announce the reopening of the Clinton email investigation wasn’t pro-Trump but forced by the FBI’s New York office discovering Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop; Comey feared a leak and acted pre-emptively. In Comey’s own memoir, he says he assumed Clinton would win, which the speaker says explains his calculus.

He repeatedly calls the alleged operation an “open and shut” case, saying Brennan, Comey, and their deputies “deserve the rest of their lives in prison” or even “banishment from North America.” He compares their actions to infamous government abuses (e.g., COINTELPRO, Waco) and says undermining an elected president is as bad as political assassination. He emphasizes that as a libertarian who never voted for Trump (mainly due to “Zionism”), he’s not personally a Trump loyalist but would defend any candidate, including a Democrat, from this kind of “post-constitutional” abuse by security agencies that “shouldn’t even exist.”

He argues the president is the only nationally elected executive and that the intelligence agencies are constitutionally beholden to him, not vice versa. Continuing the “hoax” after Trump’s election, appointing a special counsel, and leaking to the media, he says, were acts of deliberate subversion.

Finally, the speaker criticizes Trump himself for publicly commenting on the investigation, noting that such statements (like Nixon’s comment on Charles Manson) can prejudice legal outcomes. He warns Trump’s “blabbing” on Truth Social about the guilt of Comey and others could undermine prosecutions or appeals if charges are ever brought, giving defendants grounds to argue political bias.

In sum, the speaker frames this as a massive intelligence-community conspiracy against Trump begun by Brennan and Comey, later joined by Clinton’s team, knowingly built on falsehoods, and perpetuated by leaks and media coverage — all of which he believes warrants severe punishment, though he cautions that Trump’s own rhetoric could sabotage any chance of accountability.