Putin & His Weapons /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Scott Horton

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

The growing nuclear tensions between the U.S. and Russia and the broader roots of the Ukraine war.

Main points:

A Russian official, Belousov, claimed the U.S. plans to deploy short-range missiles in Europe (6–7-minute flight time to Russia) and is preparing for a potential nuclear first strike. He urged Putin to ready Russia’s nuclear test site at Novaya Zemlya.

Putin responded that Russia will stick to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty but will resume testing if Washington does. Analysts believe this exchange was scripted—Putin plays “good cop” while signaling readiness for escalation.

The U.S. continues missile platform tests (e.g., Minuteman III), and ambiguity from Trump and others about resuming nuclear warhead testing adds confusion and risk.

Broader argument:

The speaker blames U.S. and NATO policy since 2014 for provoking Russia—especially the overthrow of Ukraine’s government, NATO’s eastward expansion, and Washington’s refusal to honor or implement the Minsk peace accords.

They argue that the current nuclear brinkmanship is absurd decades after the Soviet Union’s fall and driven not by defense but by U.S. political self-interest and the “military-industrial complex.”

The Biden administration is accused of prolonging the war for electoral and bureaucratic reasons rather than security.

Trump, they claim, was prevented from improving relations with Russia because of internal opposition and impeachment.

Finally, Britain is suggested to share blame, allegedly colluding with the U.S. to push Ukraine toward confrontation despite Zelensky’s 2019 peace platform.

Overall summary:

The exchange portrays the nuclear tension as a dangerous by-product of U.S. and NATO policies, internal political motives, and defense-industry interests—pushing the world toward renewed nuclear confrontation despite the end of the Cold War.