Ukraine Corruption & Russian Assets /Patrick Henningsen & Lt Col Daniel Davis

** NEW MERCH ** Jackets & Sweatshirts, Thermo Mugs!!

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

Patrick and Danny compares corruption in Afghanistan during the Karzai era to current corruption scandals in Ukraine, arguing that both were widely known on the ground but publicly denied by Western governments. He explains that Ukraine’s anti-corruption agency NABU was created and heavily influenced by the U.S. after the 2014 Maidan events—not to eliminate corruption, he argues, but to monitor and control it. According to him, NABU protected politically useful corrupt actors (including those tied to the Bidens) while targeting inconvenient investigators or prosecutors.

A major recent scandal now coming from NABU itself suggests—he claims—that the U.S. is pulling back its protective umbrella from Zelensky’s inner circle. This could erode confidence in Ukraine both domestically and across Europe, even if EU leaders publicly deny any problem.

The discussion then shifts to Europe’s motives for prolonging the war. The speaker argues European governments know Ukraine cannot win militarily but are keeping the conflict going because they hope to seize $320 billion in frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine and plug Europe’s own financial holes. Belgium has been blocking the asset seizure due to dangerous legal precedents and risks to global financial stability.

Europe is also issuing “war bonds” whose repayment is premised on future Russian reparations—a bet the speaker calls delusional since Russia is currently winning.

Finally, the hosts cite a post by pro-Ukraine journalist Julian Röpke acknowledging that Ukraine is heading toward strategic defeat—framing it as a significant shift in mainstream European narrative and a warning sign that political leaders know the real situation but continue publicly pretending otherwise.