David Feldman
David Feldman
@davidfeldman·310K subscribers·6.4K videos

Trump's Presidential Immunity Claim Explained

Posted

January 9, 2024

Views

34,480

Likes

2,574

Comments

285

Engagement

8.29%

Search the Record

Indexed

Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.

Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.

Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line

Chapters

YouTube Description

as posted by the channel

In this highlight, Trump's attorneys argued that Donald Trump can't be tried in a criminal court because he has "presidential immunity." They're wrong.

Chapters:

- Trump and his lawyers claim the president cannot be charged after leaving office, which is untrue

- Former presidents can be charged for crimes committed while in office, as per legal precedent

- The Justice Department policy states that a sitting president cannot be indicted for crimes committed while in office, while everyone else in the executive branch, including the vice president, may be indicted.

- If the president is impeached by Congress and removed from office by the Senate, the Department of Justice can immediately indict the ex-president.

- The Supreme Court declined to expedite their ruling on presidential immunity, insisting that it go through the regular appeals process.

- The Circuit Court in Washington DC is commencing the hearing on Trump's argument for presidential immunity.

- Trump attends hearing to intimidate judges by eyeballing them and showing he knows who they are and where they live

- Trump's actions parallel legal precedents Nixon versus Fitzgerald and Clinton versus Jones

- The Supreme Court ruling allowed Paula Jones to depose Clinton while he was President.

- Ken Starr, the independent prosecutor, investigated the Whitewater scandal during Clinton's presidency.

- The sting operation involved asking Clinton about Monica Lewinsky during the Paula Jones deposition.

Presidents are not immune from criminal liability for acts committed during their term.

Presidents have absolute immunity from civil court for acts committed during their term.

- However, the Supreme Court ruled in Nixon v. Fitzgerald that presidents can be held criminally liable for authorized or unauthorized acts as president.

- Trump's lawyers are trying to delay the Georgia trial using the presidential immunity defense.

- Trump threatened to prosecute Joe Biden for similar actions

DAVID’S NEWSLETTER:

FOR MORE DAVID VISIT HIS WEBSITE:

Guests & Subjects Covered

Donald TrumpChapters Trump'sThe Justice DepartmentThe Supreme CourtThe Circuit CourtWashington DCJones APaula Jones

Sentinel Indexing in Progress

Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.

All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.

Trump's Presidential Immunity Claim Explained · David Feldman · Sentinel