Stand Your Ground Laws Make No Sense
May 21, 2015
7,342
160
162
4.39%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
David Pakman Episodes Around May 21, 2015
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
11:03Now PlayingStand Your Ground Laws Make No Sense
YouTube Description
as posted by the channel–Robert Spitzer, Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at SUNY Cortland who recently wrote the op-ed in theNew York Times titled “Stand Your Ground Makes No Sense,” joins David to discuss the many problems with “stand your ground” laws, and its disproportionate use based on race
–On the Bonus Show: A new type of blade-less wind turbine, Obama limits police access to military equipment, song intelligence analysis, more…
Become a Member
Be our Patron on Patreon
Discuss This on Reddit
TDPS Twitter
David's Twitter
24/7 Voicemail Line: (219)-2DAVIDP
Subscribe to The David Pakman Show for more
Timely news is important! We upload new clips every day, 6-8 stories! Make sure to subscribe!
Support TDPS by clicking (bookmark it too!) this link before shopping on Amazon
Broadcast on May 20, 2015 David's InstagramDonate via Bitcoin15evMNUN1g4qdRxywbHFCKNfdCTjxtztfj
--Donate via Ethereum: 0xe3E6b538E1CD21D48Ff1Ddf2D744ea8B95Ba1930
--Donate via Litecoin: LhNVT9j5gQj8U1AbwLzwfoc5okDoiFn4Mt
--Donate via Bitcoin: 15evMNUN1g4qdRxywbHFCKNfdCTjxtztfj
--Donate via Ethereum: 0xe3E6b538E1CD21D48Ff1Ddf2D744ea8B95Ba1930
--Donate via Litecoin: LhNVT9j5gQj8U1AbwLzwfoc5okDoiFn4Mt
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.