September 23, 2023
57,236
1,266
789
3.59%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
7:20Now PlayingWatch Full Interview
--------
In an open discussion about a recent boxing match between Devin Haney and Vasyl Lomachenko, Vlad and Michael Jai White express contrary views on how the sport should be judged, focusing particularly on the excitement of the game versus the scoring system. While some fans feel that the sport is rigged, acknowledging Haney's victory over Lomachenko as a cause for concern, Michael argues for a broader understanding of strategy and scoring in boxing. He hints at Haney's less thrilling but more frequent hits on Lomachenko might not please the crowd but resulted in more points for him in the match. Discussing the historical pattern of audience favoring the underdog, Michael invites everyone to re-evaluate their perspectives on the game and give more importance to skill and point accumulation over unnerving theatrics that could cloud judgment. Despite the divide, Michael and LVad agree that Haney deserved his win over Lomachenko based on the scoring system.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.