1090 Jake on Why He Thinks Young Thug Didn't Pay for YSL Woody's Lawyer (Part 4)
June 21, 2024
134,924
1,244
505
1.30%
Search the Record
IndexedEvery word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
Djvlad Episodes Around June 21, 2024
See what was published immediately before and after this episode.
4:05Now Playing1090 Jake on Why He Thinks Young Thug Didn't Pay for YSL Woody's Lawyer (Part 4)
YouTube Description
as posted by the channelWatch full interviews early, uncensored and adfree as a Member
Watch this Full Interview
--------
1090 Jake discussed the legal intricacies surrounding high-profile cases involving YSL members, including Young Thug, Gunna, and Woody. Vlad mentioned he had previously spoken with Gunna's lawyer, who now represents Donald Trump, about the complexities of pleading the Fifth due to potential federal indictments. Jake pointed out that Woody appeared ill-informed and perhaps manipulated, particularly given that he fired his lawyer, likely a public defender, in court.
Jake speculated on why Young Thug didn't ensure that key co-defendants like Woody had competent legal representation. He suggested that Thug might not be allowed to pay for someone potentially testifying against him, though Vlad countered that defendants can choose their payment sources. Jake posited it wouldn't be in Thug's interest to fund a lawyer who might end up working against him. Overall, both Vlad and Jake deemed the ongoing trial a "circus," hinting at possible appeals and mistrials in the future.
Links & Promotions
Guests & Subjects Covered
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.