East Idaho News
@eastidnews·585K subscribers·7.7K videos
Woman slams debt collection company for ‘misrepresenting facts’ as hearing is postponed
Posted
April 22, 2019
Views
364
Likes
8
Engagement
2.20%
April 22, 2019
364
8
2.20%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
1:59Now PlayingIDAHO FALLS — A woman being sued by Medical Recovery Services is slamming the debt collection company for attempting to “mischaracterize the facts” when it comes to her name and background.
A court hearing concerning the matter was postponed Monday afternoon as the woman, being sued for $5,500 by MRS, continues to fight the legal battle over a $294 bill.
The woman, whom we’re calling Mary Johnson, shared her story on EastIdahoNews.com last week. She agreed to speak publicly if her real name was not used because she is worried about the legal repercussions she may face for speaking out about MRS.
RELATED | Medical debt nightmare: Why a local woman could end up paying over $5,550 for her $294 doctor’s visit
The issue revolves around a now-paid $294 medical bill from years ago. MRS is asking that Johnson be required to pay as much as $5,583.25 to cover attorney and legal fees largely beyond her control. A judge will determine the ultimate amount Johnson must pay.
Last year, MRS attorneys Bryan Smith and Bryan Zollinger received a court order to garnish Johnson’s wages from her employer, Melaleuca, but the garnishment did not have her correct name listed. The Social Security number on the garnishment was Johnson’s, but the last name didn’t match hers.
Legal filings show Melaleuca tried to resolve the issue outside of court, but Smith and Zollinger refused. The case ended up before Magistrate Judge Michelle Mallard, and she ruled Melaleuca was correct in not garnishing the wages.
A proper garnishment with the correct name was then filed, and the debt plus original fees were paid. MRS then sued Johnson for the fees it incurred while fighting Melaleuca.
A hearing between Johnson and MRS was scheduled for Monday afternoon in Bonneville County. Smith and Johnson’s attorney, Andrew Hawes, were seen speaking with each other outside of the courtroom. After a 45-minute delay, the hearing was postponed.
It’s unclear if they reached an agreement, but in newly filed court documents, Johnson is unhappy with characterizations Smith and Medical Recovery Services have made about her name.
In previous court filings and in an interview with EastIdahoNews.com, Smith claimed that Johnson used four different “aliases,” and that’s why MRS had the wrong name on the original garnishment. But in court documents filed Friday, Hawes disputes those claims.
“MRS’s representation that the garnishments was (sic) ‘issued on all four potential aliases the defendant had gone by’ is inaccurate,” court documents state. “(Johnson) has had three different surnames: her maiden name, her first married name, and her second married name. These were (Johnson’s) legal names, not aliases … and she has never changed her last name other than after a marriage or divorce. (Johnson) strongly objects to MRS’s attempts to mischaracterize the facts.”
A hearing on the issue is now scheduled for May 8.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.
