June 13, 2023
546
7
9
2.93%
Every word spoken in this episode is indexed. Type any phrase to jump straight to the moment it was said.
Type any word or phrase that may have been spoken. Click a result to seek the player to that exact moment.
Try a name, a topic, or a quoted line
1:04:46Now PlayingIn light of the recent indictment of former President Trump over classified documents, there has been no shortage of commentary about what all of it means. However, we thought it was important to address the big elephant in the room and that's, is this a politically motivated prosecution? In this episode, we explore the significance of impartiality in investigations and how organizations like Protect Democracy () are leading the way in this area. We discuss recent politically motivated investigations, the role of journalism in upholding institutional honesty, and the release of the Special Counsel John Durham report.
We begin by examining the weaponization of government investigations, particularly in relation to President Trump. We highlight Protect Democracy's article on identifying weaponized investigations and discuss examples such as James Comey's announcement on the Clinton investigation and Alvin Bragg's indictment in NY. Additionally, we analyze the Take Care Clause and its application to presidential oversight of the Justice Department. We also scrutinize the GOP House majority's Committee on the Weaponization of Government and suggest other crucial issues they should address.
Next we assess the impartiality of Attorney General Merrick Garland and evaluate specific cases like Hunter Biden and the Trump-E. Jean Carrol case. We also discuss concerns about the Durham Report intentionally omitting relevant information. Furthermore, we explore the Durham Investigation's new findings and the assessment by DOJ IG Michael Horowitz. Lastly, we touch upon the Authoritarian Threat Index and compare the John Durham report with other investigations on Russia's interference in the 2016 election.
Join us for an insightful discussion on investigations and the vital role of impartiality in preserving our democratic values.
How to tell whether a government investigation or prosecution is “weaponized”
Investigating and Prosecuting Political Leaders in a Democracy
Guests:
Anne Tindall is Counsel at Protect Democracy, where she works to secure accountability for abuses of power and counter anti-democratic activity at the federal and state level. Prior to joining Protect Democracy, she served as Assistant General Counsel for Litigation and Oversight at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. She has also served as Counsel to the Chair/Ranking Member of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce under the leadership of Representative Henry Waxman.
Kristy Parker is Counsel at Protect Democracy. She leads litigation to secure accountability for abuses of executive power and interference with government functions, and leads advocacy to reform the Department of Justice and protect its independence from politicization. Before joining Protect Democracy, she spent 15 years as a federal prosecutor at the Justice Department, specializing in police excessive force and hate crimes cases as a Deputy Chief of the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section.
Sentinel Indexing in Progress
Metadata and chapters are available. Claim extraction for this episode is pending.
All video content is delivered via YouTube embedded players in accordance with the YouTube Terms of Service. Sentinel provides research tools that promote discovery and accountability across political media.